On 10/11/2013 7:49 AM, Robert Nelson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Charles Steinkuehler > <char...@steinkuehler.net> wrote: >> On 10/10/2013 7:09 PM, Robert Nelson wrote: >>> Regression/testing: >>> Are we missing any kernel config settings from 3.8 that you used? >>> Does your Cape still work?
If it wasn't obvious, my initial comments were meant to be toung-in-cheek. Great work on 3.12, but I need enough out-of-tree code I'll be stuck playing catch-up on 3.8 for a while. >> Does it come with Xenomai support?!? :) > > I sense, we have a new maintainer for github.com/beagleboard/kernel I'm sure I don't know what you mean... < me: runs and hides > :) > If we are going to add the Xenomai patchset, i'd feel more comfortable > if we had a developer who is using/testing/etc.. > > Part of the goal of that repo, is just have enough for everyone to use > and base off it (for Fedora, arch, etc..) I don't think the xenomai patches should be in the defalut Beagle* kernels. I was meaning more that xenomai just recently began working on 3.8 kernels for the ARM architecture, and work is ongoing to get 3.10 kernels working on x86. I suspect it will be a while before ARM 3.12 kernels have an easy-to-apply xenomai patch. :-/ >> And when can we expect SGX acceleration? > > I can't answer that. I'm a user too like you guys, and i hate NDA's > with a passion and closed "stuff".. I'm hopeing I can get the SGX drivers working on 3.8. I'm back home and can test now, if only I could find some time... I did hear rumors here about TI jumping from 3.2 to 3.12 kernel support for the SGX drivers, so if that actually happens, I can probably manage porting the xenomai stuff. At least it's open source! :) -- Charles Steinkuehler char...@steinkuehler.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
