On 8-4-2014 19:12, [email protected] wrote:
On 08/04/14 16:36, Bas Laarhoven wrote:

Regarding the connector solder quality: Hopefully they are still tuning
their production process, circuitco obviously has had more time (and >
100k boards) to do that!
e14/Embest have been building these for quite some time, but only selling to 
China

The creation date on this article is Apr 18, 2013:

http://www.element14.com/community/docs/DOC-54131/l/embest-bb-black-development-platform-based-on-ti-sitara-am3358-processor-exclusively-for-china

Now it may be that they're tuning a process on a new production line that's 
been spun up to meet demand, but that's no reason to think they don't know what 
they're doing. It is obviously a different process to CircuitCo as some of your 
earlier observations show. We also don't know how many of these boards embest 
have already sold in China in the last year.

Thanks, I wasn't aware of that. Then they're obviously using lower quality standards for their TH soldering process.


Received one today, given that it has an AM3358 and the R8/R9 change then it 
appears to be a RevB equivalent. Older version of Angstrom, but that'll be 
getting wiped in the next few mins anyway.
Different pre-installed image could certainly be a confusing problem for some 
people though.

What do you mean with older version? Both the original BBB rev B and the Embest board show the same sw pre-loaded:

U-Boot 2013.04-dirty (Jul 10 2013 - 14:02:53)
Angstrom v2012.12 - Kernel 3.8.13



With 25 years in the electronics subcontract manufacturing business behind me, 
I personally have no concerns about the quality. I suspect e14 don't either or 
they're unlikely to have engaged in wide distribution of a board that they'll 
be directly responsible for. Not like they can RMA these back to CircuitCo 
after all.

What wonders me then is why circuitco is still spending money on putting epoxy around the mini USB connector on the BBB. You seem to think that isn't necessary? Or is it that one RMA for every thousand boards is cheaper than spending a couple of cents during assembly, to prevent that RMA?

-- Bas

--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to