On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Chris Morgan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jun 26, 2014 12:10 AM, "William Hermans" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Ah, ok got it. >> >> Well . . . since it's been well over a year I think the video drivers need >> priority. This is something that I personally have no interest in, *HOWEVER* >> many do have interest, and I think it is high time TI made an effort to work >> with the community on this. >> >> From the outside looking in, it very much looks like TI is dragging their >> feet in this respect, and in a way reflects that TI has no pride in their >> products. Surely, there is much more to this than I realize, but that really >> is no excuse. >> >> So my point here I suppose is that if one business can not provide a >> working part, then perhaps it is time to look elsewhere for the specific >> part. Being an American myself I prefer to spend American, but a working >> part that has no software support is pretty much useless. That also doesn't >> mean half fast. . . >> It means working period, not only on x.y.z kernel running a single OS ( >> Android ? really ?! ) > > As a commercial user of the bbb I, and others I've talked to, feel the same > way about the video driver support on the BBB. There is a market opportunity > for someone if they could build a board of similar cost/performance but with > mainline kernel graphics support. I'd certainly prefer if TI could correct > the deficiency with the am335x though.
Can you save that for a different thread? What bylaws are desired to help make BeagleBoard.org Foundation beneficial to the BeagleBoard.org community? Please try to stick to that topic on this thread. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
