Ok, My apologies too. Still, I think we hit on an important subject. Making
sure all Beagle hardware is well supported in Linux.


On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Chris Morgan <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Jason Kridner <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Chris Morgan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Jun 26, 2014 12:10 AM, "William Hermans" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Ah, ok got it.
>> >>
>> >> Well . . . since it's been well over a year I think the video drivers
>> need
>> >> priority. This is something that I personally have no interest in,
>> *HOWEVER*
>> >> many do have interest, and I think it is high time TI made an effort
>> to work
>> >> with the community on this.
>> >>
>> >> From the outside looking in, it very much looks like TI is dragging
>> their
>> >> feet in this respect, and in a way reflects that TI has no pride in
>> their
>> >> products. Surely, there is much more to this than I realize, but that
>> really
>> >> is no excuse.
>> >>
>> >> So my point here I suppose is that if one business can not provide a
>> >> working part, then perhaps it is time to look  elsewhere for the
>> specific
>> >> part. Being an American myself I prefer to spend American, but a
>> working
>> >> part that has no software support is pretty much useless. That also
>> doesn't
>> >> mean half fast. . .
>> >> It means working period, not only on x.y.z kernel running a single OS (
>> >> Android ? really ?! )
>> >
>> > As a commercial user of the bbb I, and others I've talked to, feel the
>> same
>> > way about the video driver support on the BBB. There is a market
>> opportunity
>> > for someone if they could build a board of similar cost/performance but
>> with
>> > mainline kernel graphics support. I'd certainly prefer if TI could
>> correct
>> > the deficiency with the am335x though.
>>
>> Can you save that for a different thread? What bylaws are desired to
>> help make BeagleBoard.org Foundation beneficial to the BeagleBoard.org
>> community? Please try to stick to that topic on this thread.
>>
>> --
>>
>>
> I understand, apologies for the distraction. It looks like you have the
> spirit of our comments in the first entry under "purpose" of the proposed
> bylaws.
>
> Chris
>
>  --
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to