On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:54 AM, John Syn <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 11/10/14, 1:15 AM, "Jason Kridner" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Maxim Podbereznyy <[email protected]> >>wrote: >>> John Syn, >>> Wandboard Quad does have 64 bit memory bus. >>> >>> P.S. I don't know who needs dual DSP onboard because TI definitely will >>>not >>> support them as should like it was for omap3/dm37. I'd better have well >>> supported hardware video encoder/decoder rather than double general >>>purpose >>> DSPs without any software support >> >>When OMAP3 came out, the only compilers for C6000 were expensive, >>closed-source compilers. Now, there is support in mainline GCC for >>C6000. As the BeagleBoard.org community, we have to work together to >>enable use of the DSPs if they are of interest to the >>community---there aren't any barriers in our way. > The TI C6000 does some amazing pipeline optimization, which seems to be > missing from the GCC compiler. Anyway, using CCSV6 is no big deal, but > support for RPMSG/REMOTEPROC on this processor is a big issue. The source > is difficult to follow and my guess is we would need input from the > original authors to do this work.
Why dont we get involved in linux-omap discussions on the topic? most of the rpmsg and remote proc discussions do take place in kernel mailing list. usually discussing in context helps move patches forward since it makes it clear to certain maintainers that these things are important and help community. Do you have anything specific that you are concerned about? -- --- Regards, Nishanth Menon -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
