Yeah, what Robert said is pretty much what I've read. SYSV is partially parallel loading, where systemd is "fully" parallel.
My own problems with getting used to it is mostly due to not knowing how to do the equivalent of a Debian LSB init script ( service ) work. On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Jean-Pierre Poulin < [email protected]> wrote: > Q: Have you guys ever tried reducing boot-times through a hibernate-based > solution? (e.g. Warp) How do these stackup versus efforts to fast-boot > Linux as detailed in this thread? > > > > > On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 12:13:20 PM UTC-5, Jean-Pierre Poulin wrote: >> >> Supercool. We're hoping to reduce boot-time by using open-source based >> solutions so following the latest systemd-based efforts appears as the next >> logical step. Thanks a bunch for that useful advice!! >> >> On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 10:07:19 AM UTC-5, RobertCNelson wrote: >> >>> Then Lennart released systemd and really just blew them out of the >>> water... >>> >>> I did see a demo of timesys showing off something that booted even >>> faster then systemd, but you'll pay lots of $ for it. >>> >>> -- > For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BeagleBoard" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
