> Ha! I'm not definitely not frustrated. And as seen in other recent > posts there are other features that may not get needed TI support.
Seriously, spit it out, what feature? dsp: c6000 gcc port m4: ducati: firmware here http://git.omapzoom.org/?p=device/ti/proprietary-open.git;a=tree;f=jacinto6;h=6203e0dfe7cf89456517a1b877610f8ac2b4fd86;hb=refs/heads/d-lollipop-release pru: ti c-complier: wget http://software-dl.ti.com/codegen/esd/cgt_public_sw/PRU/2.1.0/ti_cgt_pru_2.1.0_armlinuxa8hf_busybox_installer.sh chmod +x ti_cgt_pru_2.1.0_armlinuxa8hf_busybox_installer.sh sudo ./ti_cgt_pru_2.1.0_armlinuxa8hf_busybox_installer.sh + gcc port: >> http://www.imgtec.com/ > > And I don't care about the graphics. But since you're projecting > I will say that the issue is with TI not imgtec. No one forced > TI to use imgtec. Just like no one forced intel to use it when > they decided on GMA500/Poulsbo. But instead of crying about it > an intel engineer decided to do a little heavy lifting and wrote > a driver for GMA500. Umm, slightly different. Poulsbo also included the 2d engine, so with out GMA500 driver, no "DISPLAY PERIOD..", in our case we can get video working on mainline, it's just the 3d offload we need the sgx bits for.. Regards, -- Robert Nelson http://www.rcn-ee.com/ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
