Either would work fine. Just trying to put the "concept" out there so people know what to look for information wise. What device tree is loaded is up to the individual user. Also technically I think Charles' universal IO overlay, is actually several overlays with 3-4 different options.
This is what I've read over the past several months, and since it is something of interest to me . . . somehow it was retained in my memory . . . On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:06 PM, TJF <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2014 21:54:20 UTC+1 schrieb William Hermans: >> >> ... and in this case you would probably use Charles' universal IO >> https://github.com/cdsteinkuehler/beaglebone-universal-io and once >> loaded you configure the pins ( on the fly ) from the command line. >> > > You can use this overlay, but there're some downsides. Ie. the overlay > enables all devices (SPI, UART, ...). And configuring the pins needs extra > command line activity, some pin configurations don't match the libpruio > requirements. I recommend to use libpruio-00A0.dtbo instead, which works in > the same principle but provides run-time pinmuxing capability. > > -- > For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BeagleBoard" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
