I agree. But, the IP owners seem to be worried about someone copying their IP than they are using it and getting royalties.
Gerald On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Matthijs van Duin < [email protected]> wrote: > On 12 January 2015 at 19:32, Gerald Coley <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You are correct. And all of those that were made public, evidently, >> should not have been. > > > I really don't understand all this fussing about documentation. You'd > think that being well-supported by software adds value to their IP, and > public documentation is generally rather important for that. > > (The crypto accelerators are in an even worse position: TRMs often don't > even admit to their existence, not even those for which linux drivers have > been publicly released. *rolls eyes*) > > -- > For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BeagleBoard" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Gerald [email protected] http://beagleboard.org/ http://circuitco.com/support/ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
