The device tree concept is the same. The specific implementation, pin numbers, pin-mux controls, are different for each different piece of hardware.
--- Graham == On Friday, July 24, 2015 at 5:40:32 AM UTC-5, Raul Piper wrote: > > Thanks for the linfo.Is it same for all the beagleboards?Beagleboard-xm as > well? > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Graham <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Google is your friend. >> >> Google "Beaglebone Black Device Tree" and see what you find. >> >> Good articles in Adafruit Learning System. >> >> Purchase Derek Molloy's book: >> "Exploring BeagleBone: Tools and Techniques for Building with Embedded >> Linux" >> >> >> --- Graham >> >> >> == >> >> == >> >> On Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 2:03:25 AM UTC-5, Raul Piper wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> I wanted to know the device tree concept in beagleboard family.Till now >>> i was using Pandaboard(with ubuntu, Debian and Android) and there is no >>> concept of device tree in that.Kernels used >= 3.0.1. >>> I wanted to know what changes needs to be done and in which files if we >>> wanted to interface any hardware via i2c or SPI.In panda-board we used to >>> modify the board config file (board_omap4panda.c) but I tihnk for >>> Beagleboard some thign more is to be done? >>> Kindly let me know on this. >>> Rgds >>> Rp >>> >> > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
