Thanks for the confirmation. Rgds Rp On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Graham <[email protected]> wrote:
> The device tree concept is the same. > The specific implementation, pin numbers, pin-mux controls, are different > for each different piece of hardware. > > --- Graham > > == > > On Friday, July 24, 2015 at 5:40:32 AM UTC-5, Raul Piper wrote: >> >> Thanks for the linfo.Is it same for all the beagleboards?Beagleboard-xm >> as well? >> >> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Graham <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Google is your friend. >>> >>> Google "Beaglebone Black Device Tree" and see what you find. >>> >>> Good articles in Adafruit Learning System. >>> >>> Purchase Derek Molloy's book: >>> "Exploring BeagleBone: Tools and Techniques for Building with Embedded >>> Linux" >>> >>> >>> --- Graham >>> >>> >>> == >>> >>> == >>> >>> On Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 2:03:25 AM UTC-5, Raul Piper wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi >>>> I wanted to know the device tree concept in beagleboard family.Till now >>>> i was using Pandaboard(with ubuntu, Debian and Android) and there is no >>>> concept of device tree in that.Kernels used >= 3.0.1. >>>> I wanted to know what changes needs to be done and in which files if we >>>> wanted to interface any hardware via i2c or SPI.In panda-board we used to >>>> modify the board config file (board_omap4panda.c) but I tihnk for >>>> Beagleboard some thign more is to be done? >>>> Kindly let me know on this. >>>> Rgds >>>> Rp >>>> >>> >> -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
