On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Colin Bester <[email protected]> wrote: > I used --lts per documentation, maybe that's what caused it. I thought 'lts' > sounded good as I want more stable and long term support so didn't question > it. Gotta run but will continue tomorrow and try not too bug ya'll too much!
Oh that's perfectly fine too, i've setup the "--lts" option for users that don't want massive jumps.. The problem with the "ti" repos http://repos.rcn-ee.com/latest/jessie-armhf/LATEST-ti ABI:1 STABLE 3.14.52-ti-r75 ABI:1 TESTING 4.1.6-ti-r16 3.14.x & 4.1.x are lts's from kernel.org ;) whereas we've been testing 3.14.x for a good year, 4.1.x is still only a few months old.. I'm pretty sure we are close to moving v4.1.x to stable.... Regards, -- Robert Nelson https://rcn-ee.com/ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
