On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Robert Nelson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Colin Bester <[email protected]> wrote: >> I used --lts per documentation, maybe that's what caused it. I thought 'lts' >> sounded good as I want more stable and long term support so didn't question >> it. Gotta run but will continue tomorrow and try not too bug ya'll too much! > > > Oh that's perfectly fine too, i've setup the "--lts" option for users > that don't want massive jumps.. > > The problem with the "ti" repos > > http://repos.rcn-ee.com/latest/jessie-armhf/LATEST-ti > > ABI:1 STABLE 3.14.52-ti-r75 > ABI:1 TESTING 4.1.6-ti-r16 > > 3.14.x & 4.1.x are lts's from kernel.org ;) > > whereas we've been testing 3.14.x for a good year, 4.1.x is still only > a few months old.. > > I'm pretty sure we are close to moving v4.1.x to stable....
err, forgot about the xenomai case.. We don't have an xenomai option for v4.1.x, so those users are still stuck on v3.14.x.. So till we get xenomai for v4.1.x, it'll be stuck in testing.. Regards, -- Robert Nelson https://rcn-ee.com/ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
