GPIO MODE SETTINGS
Bit 6   Bit 5   Bit 4   Bit 3   Bit 2,1,0
Slew Control    Receiver Active Pullup/Pulldown Enable Pullup/down      Mux Mode
0 Fast  0 Disable       0 Pulldown select       0 Enabled       000 Mode 0 to
1 Enable        1 Pullup select 1 Disabled      111 Mode 7       
e.g. OUTPUT GPIO(mode7) 0x07 pulldown, 0x17 pullup, 0x?f no pullup/down
e.g. INPUT GPIO(mode7) 0x27 pulldown, 0x37 pullup, 0x?f no pullup/down
TRM Table 9-60                  



>From the table above, 0x27 in an input and 0x17 is an output. My guess is that 
>there is some conflict that occurs and that is why the config isn’t set 
>correctly. What does your overlay look like and what do you see when you 
>install the overlay?

Regards,
John




> On Nov 27, 2015, at 1:03 PM, Riley Porter <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> William,
> 
> Thanks.  This basically is exactly what I did reading johns reply.  I guess 
> my main disconnect here is.  I can apply a device tree overlay that I make.  
> I see it "applied" in dmesg and in slots.  However the pinmux output from cat 
> /sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/44e10800.pinmux/pins continues to show 0x27 for 
> their modes when I specifically set the dtc to 0x17.  
> 
> I have not actually tried to use it as an input in code yet.  Merely have 
> been seeing that it is not "applying" what i thought it should.  Perhaps I am 
> looking at the wrong pinoutput?
> 
> for example P9_11's offset is 0x70 and its PIN value is 28.  So  | grep 870
> 
> root ~/bb.org-overlays # cat /sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/44e10800.pinmux/pins | 
> grep 870
> pin 28 (44e10870.0) 00000027 pinctrl-single 
> 
> which is not 0x17?
> 
> I am being very wordy here just to make sure you guys know exactly what I am 
> doing and my expectations.  
> 
> 
> 
> So does anything I am doing look wrong?
> 
> 
> 
> Again thanks a bunch guys for the help.  I have been at this for the better 
> part of a week now and I agree William it's a step in the WRONG direction 
> going to Angstrom.
> 
> ril3y
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 3:45 PM, William Hermans <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Unfortunately the "answer" was to install angstrom.  I was hoping someone on 
> the list would have some secret answer as to why applying an overlay was not 
> changing the pinmux's?
> 
> I would very much like to stick with debian but if the answer is go back 
> angstrom I guess I can live with that.
> 
> Thanks
> You do not have to go back to Angstrom, and if you ask me that is very 
> counter productive. Read my guide here: 
> http://www.embeddedhobbyist.com/2015/09/beaglebone-black-updating-device-tree-files/
>  
> <http://www.embeddedhobbyist.com/2015/09/beaglebone-black-updating-device-tree-files/>
> 
> Do note, that the kernel I talk about at the beginning is just an example. 
> You do not have to use the exact kernel I demonstrated. Any 4.x kernel should 
> work with that guide.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Riley Porter <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Yes I am running:
> Linux beaglebone 4.1.1-bone10 #1 Tue Jul 7 01:15:35 UTC 2015 armv7l GNU/Linux
> 
> I followed your instructions but still am at a loss.  I was able to update 
> the device tree compiler and the kernel which is now:
> 
> Linux beaglebone 4.1.13-ti-r33 #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Nov 20 11:00:50 UTC 2015 
> armv7l GNU/Linux
> 
>  Perhaps describing my exact steps might shed some light on my screw up?
> 
> 
> 
> This is the device tree I am testing with:
> 
> 
> 
> /* 
> snip for space
> */
> /dts-v1/;
> /plugin/;
> 
> /{
>        compatible = "ti,beaglebone", "ti,beaglebone-black";
>        part-number = "EBB-GPIO-Example";
>        version = "00A0";
> 
>        fragment@0 {
>              target = <&am33xx_pinmux>;
>            
> 
>              __overlay__ {
>                   ebb_example: EBB_GPIO_Example {
>                         pinctrl-single,pins = <
> 
> 
>                                 /*=============  Inputs ================*/
>                                 0x070 0x17  // P9_11 PINS$28 GPIO0_30 = 30 
> Input Mode7 pullup
>                                 0x078 0x17  // P9_12 PINS$30 GPIO1_28 = 60 
> Input Mode7 pullup
>                                 0x074 0x17  // P9_13 PINS$29 GPIO0_31 = 31 
> Input Mode7 pullup
>                                 0x048 0x17  // P9_14 PINS$18 GPIO1_18 = 50 
> Input Mode7 pullup
>                                 0x040 0x17  // P9_15 PINS$16 GPIO1_16 = 48 
> Input Mode7 pullup
>                                 0x04c 0x17  // P9_16 PINS$19 GPIO1_19 = 51 
> Input Mode7 pullup
>                                 0x15c 0x17  // P9_17 PINS$87 GPIO0_5  =  5 
> Input Mode7 pullup
>                                 0x158 0x17  // P9_18 PINS$86 GPIO0_4  =  4 
> Input Mode7 pullup
> 
>                                 /* OUTPUT  GPIO(mode7) 0x07 pulldown, 0x17 
> pullup, 0x?f no pullup/down */
>                                 /* INPUT   GPIO(mode7) 0x27 pulldown, 0x37 
> pullup, 0x?f no pullup/down */
>                         >;
>                   };
>              };
>        };
> 
>        fragment@1 {
>                 target = <&ocp>;
>                 __overlay__ {
>                         gpio_helper {
>                                 compatible = "gpio-of-helper";
>                                 status = "okay";
>                                 pinctrl-names = "default";
>                                 pinctrl-0 = <&ebb_example>;
>                         };
>                 };
>         };
> };
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I also removed ALL overlays from my system before doing this below.
> Here is my output from slots and a python program to get the pins i wrote:
> 
> root ~/bbb_stuff # slots
>  0: PF----  -1 
>  1: PF----  -1 
>  2: PF----  -1 
>  3: PF----  -1 
>  9: P-O-L-   0 Override Board Name,00A0,Override Manuf,EBB-GPIO-Example
> 
> root ~/bbb_stuff # ./getpins 
> 
> ==================================================
> Reading Pinux Pins
> ==================================================
> 
> pin 16 (44e10840.0) 00000027 pinctrl-single
> pin 18 (44e10848.0) 00000027 pinctrl-single
> pin 19 (44e1084c.0) 00000027 pinctrl-single
> pin 28 (44e10870.0) 00000017 pinctrl-single
> pin 29 (44e10874.0) 00000027 pinctrl-single
> pin 30 (44e10878.0) 00000027 pinctrl-single
> pin 86 (44e10958.0) 00000027 pinctrl-single
> pin 87 (44e1095c.0) 00000027 pinctrl-single
> 
> You can clearly see I have requested them all to be 0x17?  
> 
> Here are the alias's I am using:
> pins='cat /sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/44e10800.pinmux/pins'
> slots='cat /sys/devices/platform/bone_capemgr/slots'
> 
> 
> 
> This is the command i used to compile the dt.
> dtc -O dtb -o EBB-GPIO-Example-00A0.dtbo -b 0 -@ EBB-GPIO-Example.dts
> 
> This is the command I used to install it:
> echo  EBB-GPIO-Example-00A0 > "/sys/devices/platform/bone_capemgr/slots"
> 
> 
> 
> This is the dmesg output after installing the overlay:
> 
> [ 2629.259630] bone_capemgr bone_capemgr: part_number 
> 'EBB-GPIO-Example-00A0', version 'N/A'
> [ 2629.259679] bone_capemgr bone_capemgr: slot #11: override
> [ 2629.259700] bone_capemgr bone_capemgr: Using override eeprom data at slot 
> 11
> [ 2629.259722] bone_capemgr bone_capemgr: slot #11: 'Override Board 
> Name,00A0,Override Manuf,EBB-GPIO-Example'
> [ 2629.271307] gpio-of-helper ocp:gpio_helper: ready
> [ 2629.271555] bone_capemgr bone_capemgr: slot #11: dtbo 
> 'EBB-GPIO-Example-00A0.dtbo' loaded; overlay id #0
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> So any help guys would be really appreciated!  I am thinking that I must be 
> just doing something wrong.  Perhaps the example device tree I am using is 
> outdated?  Would someone be willing to share with me a GPIO device tree that 
> works with kernel 4.1?  Also I have tried the dt builder online:
> 
> http://kilobaser.com/blog/2014-07-28-beaglebone-black-devicetreeoverlay-generator#1gpiodto
>  
> <http://kilobaser.com/blog/2014-07-28-beaglebone-black-devicetreeoverlay-generator#1gpiodto>
> But this seems to not work also.  Thanks again everyone.
> 
> 
> 
> Riley
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:13 PM, John Syne <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> That is strange because it seems to be working for everyone else. What is 
> your kernel version?
> 
> If you are using kernel version 4.1 or higher, then do the following on your 
> BBB
> 
> git clone https://github.com/RobertCNelson/bb.org-overlays.git 
> <https://github.com/RobertCNelson/bb.org-overlays.git>
> 
> Follow the instructions readme.md <http://readme.md/> file. My guess is you 
> don’t have the correct Device Tree Compiler, but this repo will install the 
> correct version. 
> 
> Regards,
> John
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Nov 26, 2015, at 8:35 AM, Riley Porter <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hey guys,
>> 
>> I have been fighting this for a few days now.  But it seems to me that no 
>> matter what I do I cannot get the pinmux'ing to work when applying overlays 
>> in debian.  I have tried 7.8 and 8.2 and either is really different.
>> 
>> I was looking around to see if I was the only one in this boat and it turns 
>> out I found a post on stack exchange that describes my issue perfectly.
>> 
>> Unfortunately the "answer" was to install angstrom.  I was hoping someone on 
>> the list would have some secret answer as to why applying an overlay was not 
>> changing the pinmux's?
>> 
>> I would very much like to stick with debian but if the answer is go back 
>> angstrom I guess I can live with that.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> -- 
>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss 
>> <http://beagleboard.org/discuss>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "BeagleBoard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
> 
> 
> -- 
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss 
> <http://beagleboard.org/discuss>
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
> 
> 
> -- 
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss 
> <http://beagleboard.org/discuss>
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
> 
> 
> -- 
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss 
> <http://beagleboard.org/discuss>
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
> 
> 
> -- 
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss 
> <http://beagleboard.org/discuss>
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to