Last time I built using Roberts scripts, it built fine for wheezy, but I
was also using an i386 wheezy install to built it.

Also, what Robert days for sysv versus systemd is true in my case, but you
can also apt-get remove systemd after apt-get install sysv. There are
guides all over the web on how this is done, as most long time Debian sys
admins seem to dislike systemd with a passion.

Heres one such wiki . . .
http://without-systemd.org/wiki/index.php/How_to_remove_systemd_from_a_Debian_jessie/sid_installation

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Robert Nelson <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 5:22 PM, darklight wu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > 2015/12/24/ 03:54,"Robert Nelson" <[email protected]>wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 1:46 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > Hi, Everyone:
> >> >
> >> > I'm going to setup a cross-toolchain of BBB for developers using
> CentOS
> >> > or
> >> > Windows.
> >> >
> >> > I have read the Cross Toolchain for Debian Wheezy, which told about
> >> > creating
> >> > the cross-toolchain. But it did not find a way to generate the
> sysroot.
> >> > The
> >> > sysroot should include all the libraries and headers that I need to
> >> > distribute. I think it has to be created in some way. Anyone can share
> >> > something useful to build the sysroot?
> >>
> >> One of the big issues with wheezy, it had fairly old libc, so any of
> >> the pre-built linaro toolchains are just going to cause issues..
> > Yes, that's why i am trying to build such a toolchain. I have not looked
> > into your script for wheezy. Is that workable?
> >
> >>
> >> So for 'wheezy' it's just best to build on an armhf machine..
> >>
> >> Now if you switch to jessie on the bbb. Jessie's multi-arch was much
> >> better, so you can install debian jessie on your x86 and install all
> >> the *armhf* libraries via apt..
>
> > Since my customers insisted to use windows or CentOS as their dev env,
> how
> > can I make a tarball of the toolchain and sysroot and run it on CentOS
> and
> > Windows, no matter Wheezy or Jessie? For sysroot, how can i select
> necessary
> > libs and headers? I did not find any useful information or discussion on
> > creating sysroot that needs some customization.
>
> So for, CentOS, the eaisest thing would be us qemu/debootstrap to
> install the "wheezy"/"jessie" sysroot into a chroot...
>
> Windows would be a pain.. (specially wheezy)
>
> >> here are the jessie cross toolchains:
> >>
> >> http://www.emdebian.org/News/2014/20141025.html
> >>
> >> In stretch it'll even be easier to cross..
> > I am new for BBB. How stable is Jessie comparing with Wheezy? I am
> building
> > commercial product so stability is the most important thing. But anyway,
> we
> > will do evaluation.
>
> So they are both, stable...  Jessie has a lot newer components then
> Wheezy..
>
> As for the kernel, all options are in the repo..
>
> So wither you want to run, "3.8.13" with Jessie or, "4.4.x" with
> Wheezy, that's up to you..
>
> Some people like sysv of wheezy, while others like systemd of jessie..
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Robert Nelson
> https://rcn-ee.com/
>
> --
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to