These processors only have ARM cores and GPU. No DSP, no CortexM4, no PRU. Not 
even close.

Regards,
John




> On Feb 21, 2016, at 3:04 PM, William Hermans <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> By the way. nVidia  has the Jetson K1 and T1 boards . . . they are nVidias 
> own brand of ARM of course, and as such have much better / faster graphics. 
> These run around $220 last I looked.
> 
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 4:01 PM, William Hermans <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> You are talking about a computer which doesn't interface directly to buses 
> like I2C, SPI, GPIO, I2S, etc
> 
> Have you ever used a true bare metal board ? Something that only has an MCU 
> for the boards main processor ? Such as PIC32, Cortex M0/0+, M3, M4, or an 
> MSP430 ?
> 
> It would not be hard to combine one, or multiples of these types of embedded 
> devboards to even a regular PC. USB also does not have the  be the medium of 
> communication either. Communication could be done over ethernet, wifi, 
> bluetooth, *or* USB and remain practical.
> 
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 3:47 PM, John Syne <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I’m not saying the NUC isn’t a great deal, but it is targeting a different 
> market to the x15. You are talking about a computer which doesn't interface 
> directly to buses like I2C, SPI, GPIO, I2S, etc. Connecting these buses via 
> USB is a real headache. You cannot use a Linux driver for devices connected 
> to these buses. You have to write your own user space drivers. The only 
> solution I know of that compares to the x15 is the Qualcomm Snapdragon 
> Evaluation board, which has CortexA15, GPU, DSP and direct access to 
> peripherals. Problem is, this board is over $1,000. 
> 
> Regards,
> John
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Feb 21, 2016, at 2:31 PM, William Hermans <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> That depends what one wants to do John. Such a board with additional 
>> hardware could be made to do the same job as any embedded system.
>> 
>> So, what if you need just a few embedded peripherals, but need an incredibly 
>> solid M.E.A.N. stack ? Mongo is currently not fully functional on armhf 
>> ABI's. So in this context it makes perfect sense. I can probably also dream 
>> up other situations as well if i cared to.
>> 
>> Cost wise, it may not make sense, and efficiency wise it also may not make 
>> sense. But these are factors that not everyone cares about.
>> 
>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 2:10 PM, John Syne <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> I’m not sure how you make this comparison. You are comparing a processor to 
>> a SOC (System on Chip). The AM5728 has direct access to GPIO, SPI, I2C, 
>> PCIe, USB3, UART, etc. The Pentium does not have direct access to these, but 
>> access PCI, USB3, UART via North/South bridge. No direct access to any of 
>> the other peripherals supported by the AM5728. In addition, the AM5728 
>> supports Dual CortexM4, Dual DSP and Quad PRU. Comparing these boards makes 
>> no sense. They are used for completely different markets. 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> John
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Feb 21, 2016, at 10:24 AM, Graham <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Intel NUC. 
>>> Your choice of Celeron, Pentium, i3, i5 or i7. (uses laptop processors)
>>> 4 inches by 4 inches circuit board.
>>> You can get a quad core 2.4 GHz Pentium (including a case) for less than 
>>> the X-15. 
>>> Go to Amazon.com <http://amazon.com/>, search for "Intel NUC NUC5PPYH"
>>> (The X-15 now seems to be up to $259 USD at Mouser, with deliveries 
>>> starting this month.)
>>> The NUC still needs plug-in DRAM, a laptop disk drive, and an OS.
>>> Works fine with Linux.
>>> If you want to run a bunch of GPIO, you will have to go out through FTDI 
>>> USB to I2C or SPI, then use expander IC's.
>>> 
>>> --- Graham
>>> 
>>> ==
>>> 
>>> On Sunday, February 21, 2016 at 10:47:31 AM UTC-6, [email protected] 
>>> <http://yahoo.co.uk/> wrote:
>>> Are there any other boards out there with a comparable spec to the X15? I'd 
>>> like to see what else is available, especially with this kind of chipset 
>>> and performance.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss 
>>> <http://beagleboard.org/discuss>
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "BeagleBoard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to [email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss 
>> <http://beagleboard.org/discuss>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "BeagleBoard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss 
>> <http://beagleboard.org/discuss>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "BeagleBoard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
> 
> 
> -- 
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss 
> <http://beagleboard.org/discuss>
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss 
> <http://beagleboard.org/discuss>
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to