Hi William and Peter again…
Can it actually be a module problem if it is creating the directories for the 
devices one wire bus, just not detecting the devices?

Thanks!

Matt

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of REDDING Matthew
Sent: Tuesday, 5 April 2016 10:14 AM
To: BeagleBoard
Subject: Re: [beagleboard] Re: Troubleshooting one-wire DS18B20 detection on 
BBB, debian, kernel: 3.8.13-bone70

Hi William and Peter...


root@beaglebone:~# lsmod
Module                  Size  Used by
arc4                    1691  2
zd1211rw               43946  0

mac80211              424813  1 zd1211rw
cfg80211              354018  2 mac80211,zd1211rw
rfkill                 16672  2 cfg80211
g_multi                50407  2
libcomposite           15028  1 g_multi
omap_rng                4062  0
mt7601Usta            639170  0


Using the modprobe w1-gpio produces no output.

Is this where the problem is?

Thanks

Matt


On Tuesday, April 5, 2016 at 10:08:36 AM UTC+10, William Hermans wrote:
william@beaglebone:~$ sudo modprobe w1-gpio
william@beaglebone:~$ lsmod
Module                  Size  Used by
w1_gpio                 3069  0
wire                   27112  1 w1_gpio
. . .
My understanding was that 3.8 and above kernels needed no module, simply the 
DTO. It was pre 3.8 kernels that required the kernel module. Or am I missing 
something there? Certainly, every page I'm reading referring to 3.8 kernel 
1Wire has absolutely no reference to kernel modules.
So, perhaps, but if there is something wrong with the device tree blob file, 
the driver wont auto load. Which would give us an indication as to what's wrong.


On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Peter Lawler <[email protected]<javascript:>> 
wrote:


On 2016/04/05 9:49 AM, William Hermans wrote:
  Ok, so the device tree seems to load but where is
the output of lsmod ? It should look something like( more or less ) with
hopefully the generic one-wire module also loaded.

My understanding was that 3.8 and above kernels needed no module, simply the 
DTO. It was pre 3.8 kernels that required the kernel module. Or am I missing 
something there? Certainly, every page I'm reading referring to 3.8 kernel 
1Wire has absolutely no reference to kernel modules.

P.


--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected]<javascript:>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/nT93pfbvCzQ/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

------------------------------
The information in this email together with any attachments is intended only 
for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
and/or privileged material. There is no waiver of any confidentiality/privilege 
by your inadvertent receipt of this material. 
Any form of review, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication 
of this email message is prohibited, unless as a necessary part of Departmental 
business.
If you have received this message in error, you are asked to inform the sender 
as quickly as possible and delete this message and any copies of this message 
from your computer and/or your computer system network.
------------------------------

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to