Sounds good to me!

Gerald


On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Dave Loomis <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> > You can sum it all up into this; The problem is completely solved by
> using a battery and having acpid installed. Except you need a way to
> completely disconnect power, from the BBB's input, for a single, or perhaps
> two corner cases that would otherwise require a hard reset.
>
> I love the no-nonsense mentality, and quality design behind this approach
> for most use cases.  But, for some high-reliability use cases like mine --
> a device permanently installed in a remote, client wall — batteries aren’t
> a great fit.
>
>         For long-term accessibility:    Battery maintenance, even after
> years of initial functionality, is extremely inconvenient or impossible.
>         For insurance reasons:          The potential liability of
> installing LiPo, which is known to have potential fire issues, into a
> client’s wall.
>         For shipping reasons:           The added hassle of international
> shipping of LiPo-based systems.
>
> > All these fancy high cost solutions are honestly ridiculous, and if you
> can just use an OTS UPS . . .
>
>          Hardware cost is relative.  The “high” cost (<$100) of a system
> design is nothing, if it will potentially save me things like panicked
> client calls, last-minute international plane tickets and high-pressure
> field repairs.  Those just aren’t fun.  Obviously every project out there
> isn’t heading to a NASA rover, but in some lines of work this kind of
> service is expected when a high-end, mission-critical system goes down.  In
> the end, if I do my job right, the price is just passed on to the client
> who is willing to pay a premium for a high reliability, maintenance-free
> product.
>
> I’d like to be able to deploy those systems based on the BBB, because I
> know it, find the platform highly versatile, and a good match for the
> variety of projects I take on.  I think the PRUs especially make this a
> very unique little SoC.
>
> Best,
> ST
>
>
>
> --
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/8A4F134B-E937-4958-8A25-E8BEDB02E6FC%40lumieria.com
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Gerald

[email protected]
http://beagleboard.org/
[email protected]

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CAHK_S%2Bf%3Dk5zSYuJ95pf03BFrVxC5%3Dqm0YUguSZ%2B2_y1mwiSDkQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to