Hi,

The same is happening on the other webcam i have (not sure if its openCV
changing resolution). I bought it on AliExpress and has the following
discription; HD 1.3 megapixel 960p 2.8-12mm varifocal lens Aptina AR0130
android external usb camera module with IR cut ELP-USB130W01MT-FV
<http://www.aliexpress.com/item/HD-1-3-megapixel-2-8-12mm-varifocal-lens-android-external-usb-camera-module-with-IR/32295825258.html>.
The supplier can be found on http://www.elpcctv.com.

Since there are no errors, what could be the problem? Is there some
dependencies i have to install?

I tested with your framebrabber.c code and was getting this (see below)
with the Logitech webcam,

root@beaglebone:~# time ./framegrabber -f mjpeg -H 480 -W 640 -c 1000 -I 30
Startup took 0.010000 seconds
Captured 1000 frames in 0.220000 seconds
Shutdown took 0.000000 seconds


real    0m42.068s
user    0m0.025s
sys    0m0.223s

The no name webcam was giving the following results;
root@beaglebone:~# time ./framegrabber -f mjpeg -H 480 -W 640 -c 1000 -I 30
Startup took 0.020000 seconds
Captured 1000 frames in 0.260000 seconds
Shutdown took 0.000000 seconds


real    2m10.965s
user    0m0.033s
sys    0m0.262s
root@beaglebone:~#



On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Matthew Witherwax <[email protected]>
wrote:

> There are no actual errors in the output you posted.
>
> Do you have access to any other webcams?  I have tested this with the
> Logitech C920, the Logitech C270, and the PS3Eye.  Without access to your
> webcam, it is hard for me to look into what is going on.
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 at 8:57:55 AM UTC-5, Tinashe Mudavanhu wrote:
>
>> The timeout error resurfaced again, i followed you blog post on
>> http://blog.lemoneerlabs.com/3rdParty/Darling_BBB_30fps_DRAFT.html but
>> got the following errors in compiling libjpeg-turbo ;
>>
>> root@beaglebone:~/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0/build# make
>> make  all-recursive
>> make[1]: Entering directory `/root/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0/build'
>> Making all in java
>> make[2]: Entering directory `/root/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0/build/java'
>> make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
>> make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0/build/java'
>> Making all in simd
>> make[2]: Entering directory `/root/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0/build/simd'
>> make  all-am
>> make[3]: Entering directory `/root/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0/build/simd'
>> make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
>> make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0/build/simd'
>> make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0/build/simd'
>> Making all in md5
>> make[2]: Entering directory `/root/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0/build/md5'
>> make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
>> make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0/build/md5'
>> make[2]: Entering directory `/root/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0/build'
>> make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0/build'
>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0/build'
>> root@beaglebone:~/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0/build#
>>
>>
>> Before compiling libjpeg-turbo i tested my code to see what will be
>> happening on the resolution and frame rate. I am working with a Logitech
>> QuickCam E3500 which has support for both YUVY and MJPEG. I set the
>> resolution to 320x240 with a 30fps frame rate but after running the code,
>> got select timeout errors and the resolution had changed to 640x480 YUVY
>> with a 15fps frame rate;
>>
>> root@beaglebone:~/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0/build# v4l2-ctl -V
>> Format Video Capture:
>>     Width/Height  : 640/480
>>     Pixel Format  : 'YUYV'
>>     Field         : None
>>     Bytes per Line: 1280
>>     Size Image    : 614400
>>     Colorspace    : SRGB
>> root@beaglebone:~/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0/build#
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Tinashe Mudavanhu <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Matthew,
>>>
>>> I'm a rookie in this linux/opencv area i wouldn't really know what it
>>> means, only learning from you. I posted a question
>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!category-topic/beagleboard/debian/VFuvveM_8Gc
>>> looking for a solution because it always happened when i plugged in the
>>> webcam on BBB. Running the command i previously mentioned ended my woes.
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Matthew Witherwax <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The issue causing the select time out detailed in my article has to do
>>>> with how much data is being sent over the USB and how it is sent. Reducing
>>>> the frame rate reduces the load on the USB. Looking at the articles you
>>>> linked, one says it solved an issue but not the select timeout, and the
>>>> other shows an error message that says it could not allocate memory.
>>>> Neither one of these are the cause of the select timeout I addressed.
>>>>
>>>> The select timeout occurs when the select times out. Looks like in the
>>>> cases in your links a previous call to allocate memory failed followed by
>>>> select failing. I have never had an issue with memory allocation. All my
>>>> troubles had to do with too much data on the USB. You might want to confirm
>>>> what your actual problem is.
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> From: Tinashe Mudavanhu
>>>> Sent: ‎5/‎23/‎2016 4:58 PM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Re: [beagleboard] Re: VGA camera capture
>>>>
>>>> Hi Matthew,
>>>>
>>>> I looked into the article as i went through your discussion but did not
>>>> try the framegrabber.c, will test it though. I finally got a solution to
>>>> the problem from links listed below. It kind of made sense to me (lack of
>>>> memory in ARM systems) because running the same code on my PC worked
>>>> perfectly well. Running this command `sysctl vm.overcommit_memory=1` worked
>>>> for me after a long struggle. What i'm not really sure are the implications
>>>> (being it on Hardware or Software) if there comes a state when large size
>>>> memory is really needed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   [1]: https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=17773
>>>>   [2]:
>>>> https://tequals0.wordpress.com/2014/03/24/libv4l2-error-allocation-conversion-buffer-using-opencv-on-a-pi/
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Matthew Witherwax <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Tinashe,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please see my article here
>>>>> http://blog.lemoneerlabs.com/post/BBB-webcams
>>>>> There is a version of framegrabber.c linked to it that allows you to
>>>>> specify the frame rate with the command line parameter -I.  If reducing 
>>>>> the
>>>>> frame rate works for you, then the code for framegrabber should provide a
>>>>> starting point for accomplishing the same thing in your own program.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Tinashe Mudavanhu <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Firstly i would like to say i came across your discussion looking for
>>>>>> select timeout error solution but as i went through it i didnt notice if
>>>>>> you found a solution, but if you have it now, i would appreciate it. The
>>>>>> select timeout error still seems to be in existence even on BBB Rev C 
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> kernel  3.8.13-bone79. I am working on an Iris recognition system that
>>>>>> initially has to track eyes in a live video stream (from there captures
>>>>>> cropped eye images that will be processed). I have installed different
>>>>>> OpenCV versions, 2.4.9, 2.4.11 and 3.0.0 and in all of them i am getting
>>>>>> the same error. I am working with a Logitech, Inc. QuickCam E 3500 
>>>>>> webcam.
>>>>>> I am accessing the BBB Desktop using Tightvnc client on my PC running
>>>>>> Ubuntu 14.04 LTS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is surprising is that it is capable of video streaming with
>>>>>> opencv installed by apt-get (apt-get install python-opencv) but the
>>>>>> limitation with this version is that it has very old cv bindings and
>>>>>> documentation on some functions for Histogram equalisation is not 
>>>>>> available
>>>>>> online. I am stuck, i need your help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tuesday, 10 September 2013 16:50:46 UTC+2, Matthew Witherwax wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Getting another BBB or raspberry pi probably wont help, but a U2
>>>>>>> from HardKernel here
>>>>>>> http://www.hardkernel.com/renewal_2011/products/prdt_info.php?g_code=G135341370451
>>>>>>> probably would.  You can use the BBB to do all IO and use the processing
>>>>>>> power of the U2 to handle compute intensive tasks.  That is actually my 
>>>>>>> end
>>>>>>> goal.  The cpu use I stated earlier was without showing the image.
>>>>>>> Displaying the image will increase cpu use.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am also working on a tracking application with the webcam mounted
>>>>>>> on a servo.  For my purposes, I do not need to see the image on the BBB 
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> can push it over wifi to my laptop if I want to view it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As far as cv code, what are you looking for?  I have posted a tool
>>>>>>> on my blog here http://blog.lemoneerlabs.com/post/shades-of-red to
>>>>>>> help you find HSV values from images to allow you to to find values to
>>>>>>> threshold target colors.  I will post another one on using HSV ranges to
>>>>>>> threshold an image to isolate things like a red colored ball.  I have 
>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>> implementing OpenCV code using python right now for experimentation, but
>>>>>>> you should be able to translate it to C++ or your language of choice.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The command v4l2-ctl --list-formats-ext will tell you the pixel
>>>>>>> formats and resolutions supported by your camera.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hope this helps,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matthew Witherwax
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:48 AM, James Richins <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matthew,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It does remind of something on Derek Molloy's site in that he adds
>>>>>>>> coding to deal with the h264 codec for taking stills with opencv. I
>>>>>>>> hesitated at the idea. Interestingly even using an additional bbb or
>>>>>>>> raspberry pi might not even help. I'm looking at camera tracking
>>>>>>>> objects/object recognition and servo control.
>>>>>>>> I might find that by not displaying the video on the monitor, that
>>>>>>>> the tracking and servo control can work less than 100% CPU.
>>>>>>>> I have yet to implement the cv code for that, it's a real struggle
>>>>>>>> to find good code. And not get errors. I have managed servo control 
>>>>>>>> through
>>>>>>>> python and manual entering numbers so its ultimately possible.
>>>>>>>> I'm not sure if my camera does anything other than yuyv. I'd be
>>>>>>>> interested in connecting an Ethernet cam to the Ethernet port and read
>>>>>>>> camera data from there, but you'd probably run into the same problem.
>>>>>>>> Ethernet cam to pc processing cv code, wifi to beaglebone servo control
>>>>>>>> might be good. But its probably a slow process and too complicated for 
>>>>>>>> me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anyway good luck with your project.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> James
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10 Sep 2013, at 13:57, Matthew Witherwax <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> James,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have not done any cpu testing other than while saving single
>>>>>>>> frames.  In MJPEG format, capturing a single frame at 1920x1080 30 fps 
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> saving it was taking about 6% cpu.  Doing the same in YUYV at a reduced
>>>>>>>> resolution and converting to jpeg was taking about 70%.  I would not 
>>>>>>>> rush
>>>>>>>> out to buy a h264 camera.  First, I am not sure OpenCV decodes h264
>>>>>>>> streams.  Second, if it did, I am not sure you would see much 
>>>>>>>> improvement
>>>>>>>> because of the need to decode the h264 stream.  If the BBB does this in
>>>>>>>> hardware is likely wont be bad, but if it is a software implementation 
>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>> are just shifting the burden.  I am currently working through several
>>>>>>>> tradeoffs.  YUYV should give the truest image free of compression
>>>>>>>> artifacts, but will be larger and require more resources to capture and
>>>>>>>> process.  MJPEG may suffer from compression artifacts, but images can 
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>> captured more quickly and at higher resolutions.  One has to decide 
>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>> combination of frame rate, resolution, and fidelity are required.  I am
>>>>>>>> currently working through the permutations to see what suits my 
>>>>>>>> application.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> An option I have open is to send the captured images over a wifi
>>>>>>>> link to a computer that runs all the OpenCV code and pipes back the 
>>>>>>>> data I
>>>>>>>> am after.  This leaves the BBB mostly free to do other work.  I will 
>>>>>>>> update
>>>>>>>> as I progress.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matthew Witherwax
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:35 AM, James Richins <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Did you register anything on CPU usage. I know running moustache
>>>>>>>>> placing cv code it will run at 100% CPU on a standard webcam. Is pre
>>>>>>>>> processing less cpu intensive or will cv code always push the bb to 
>>>>>>>>> the max?
>>>>>>>>> I didn't think I'd rush to buy a h264 hardware encoding cam if its
>>>>>>>>> the software and running at 320 is just as efficient as preencoded hd
>>>>>>>>> video.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10 Sep 2013, at 13:16, Matthew Witherwax <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> João,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1.  Glad to hear you are making progress.  My blog is at
>>>>>>>>> blog.lemoneerlabs.com.  Unfortunately I have yet to post my write
>>>>>>>>> up on the USB cameras, but I will get it done soon.  I can tell you 
>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>> the Logitech C920 it is possible to capture 1920x1080 frames with the 
>>>>>>>>> FPS
>>>>>>>>> set to 30 in both MJPEG and YUYV format.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2.  v4l2grab sets the format to YUYV before grabbing the frames.
>>>>>>>>> It then converts the captured frame to a jpeg and saves it.  I will 
>>>>>>>>> post a
>>>>>>>>> version to my blog this week that uses MJPEG instead.  Typical MJPEG
>>>>>>>>> implementations encode each video frame as a jpeg.  The code I wrote 
>>>>>>>>> puts
>>>>>>>>> the webcam in MJPEG mode for capture and saves the returned frame.  
>>>>>>>>> In the
>>>>>>>>> case of the Logitech C920, the returned frame is a jpeg image.  It 
>>>>>>>>> seems by
>>>>>>>>> going this route the camera actually creates the jpeg sparing the BBB 
>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>> having to do it.  In addition, the jpeg is considerably smaller than 
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> YUYV frame resulting in less load on the USB.  I would appreciate you
>>>>>>>>> testing the output when I post the code as it is entirely possible 
>>>>>>>>> that not
>>>>>>>>> all cameras handle MJPG the same, and the result might not be a valid 
>>>>>>>>> jpeg.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3.  13.2 MB/s is the limit I was able to reach through testing.
>>>>>>>>> You should note the webcam I tested with for that number only did bulk
>>>>>>>>> transfers which guarantee delivery.  It may be slightly higher for
>>>>>>>>> isochronous transfers as frames can (and seem to) get dropped.  I am 
>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>> sure why that is the limit.  It maybe a hardware issue or a USB driver
>>>>>>>>> implementation issue.  During further testing on several laptops, the 
>>>>>>>>> newer
>>>>>>>>> ones could reach a higher throughput even though all had a USB 2 bus 
>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>> would lead me to believe it is hardware related, but it is a question 
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>> the hardware guys.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 4.  I will post my code this week.  Please test it with your MJPEG
>>>>>>>>> capable cameras, and let me know the results.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 5.  The UVC implementation in Linux does not support still image
>>>>>>>>> capture.  This means tools like v4l2grab set the camera to record in 
>>>>>>>>> a mode
>>>>>>>>> that uses no compression or intra-frame compression (
>>>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intra-frame) and then grab frames
>>>>>>>>> from the stream.  This is why the format and frame rate affect the
>>>>>>>>> capture.  The stream has to be open and the data pulled before we can 
>>>>>>>>> grab
>>>>>>>>> an image.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 6.  Possibly, see 3.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 7.  For my purposes, I have not tested plug-and-play so I cannot
>>>>>>>>> say much about it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:15 PM, João M. S. Silva <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Matthew, Don.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here is my follow up:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1. Matthew, what is you blog address?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2. I compiled v4l2grab and used the -I switch to adjust the fps.
>>>>>>>>>> I found out that with the Logitech camera I can capture 640x480 at 
>>>>>>>>>> up to 6
>>>>>>>>>> fps. With -I 7 or above, it hangs. With another cheap camera, even 
>>>>>>>>>> -I 1
>>>>>>>>>> hangs!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 3. Is 13.2 MB/s somehow BBB's limit? Why?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 4. My cheap cameras are YUYV capable and one of them is MJPEG
>>>>>>>>>> capable. The Logitech is both YUYV and MJPEG capable.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 5. As I've read elsewhere UVC does not allow to get still images,
>>>>>>>>>> so video performance issues affect still image capturing, right? is 
>>>>>>>>>> there a
>>>>>>>>>> way to capture pure still images (bandwidth limitations should be
>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant in that case)?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 6. Overall, this is an issue from the BBB, right? All of this
>>>>>>>>>> works in my laptop and in BBXM. Is it a bug from the BBB USB 
>>>>>>>>>> implementation?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 7. I also found BBB's USB is not really plug-and-play. Sometimes
>>>>>>>>>> devices don't get recognized and a reboot is needed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic
>>>>>>>>>> in the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/2NO62mGcSvA/unsubscribe
>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email
>>>>>>>>>> to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in
>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/2NO62mGcSvA/unsubscribe
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email
>>>>>>>>> to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in
>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/2NO62mGcSvA/unsubscribe
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email
>>>>>>>>> to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in
>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/2NO62mGcSvA/unsubscribe
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in
>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/2NO62mGcSvA/unsubscribe
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in
>>>>>> the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/2NO62mGcSvA/unsubscribe
>>>>>> .
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/ecbcf781-d04a-4a40-b6d3-1a33e5e26267%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/ecbcf781-d04a-4a40-b6d3-1a33e5e26267%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>>>>> Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/2NO62mGcSvA/unsubscribe.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [The entire original message is not included.]
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>>>> Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/2NO62mGcSvA/unsubscribe.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/57438c64.87c30d0a.b3918.2ced%40mx.google.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/57438c64.87c30d0a.b3918.2ced%40mx.google.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/2NO62mGcSvA/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/a0d097f6-2657-436a-9551-f8c6d4fb48c2%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/a0d097f6-2657-436a-9551-f8c6d4fb48c2%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CADw4j_vKbt2evb%2B14UcvX55ax%3Dy4KqrCcLT%2BOJgs4iGDOoRGFw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to