On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 7:42 PM Peter Lawler <[email protected]> wrote: > > I can confirm that having done precisely this on the weekend, it works. > Though it took me a while to find the hidden notation about it. > May I humbly suggest that the robotics package checks the necessary > bootloader during install/update and defaults to "fixing" it (or at least > suggesting it should be fixed and how)? I can't quite imagine a scenario > going forward where folks would not necessarily want this except if they are > on a really old kernel and stuff.
Like what is stated here: http://strawsondesign.com/docs/librobotcontrol/installation.html#installation_s5 Regards, -- Robert Nelson https://rcn-ee.com/ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CAOCHtYhGXv4T%2Bx1itcCHs1B11NzxcAx84AVHyqKff8PNgpJZEQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
