On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 06:03:58PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > (Stefan will probably want to weigh in at this point.)
Chiming in here: yeah, I've been thinking about it too. In abstract terms it would probably make more sense but I'm also very sympathetic to Martin's use case of using org-mode together with beancount-mode (which I believe it's why he wants to keep it a minor-mode, right Martin?). Is there any other way of achieving the same? e.g., maybe by refactoring the code so that you've both a major mode and a minor mode (maybe org-mode specific) coming from the same code base? Are there other examples of similar needs in the Emacs ecosystem? Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . [email protected] . upsilon.cc/zack . . o . . . o . o Computer Science Professor . CTO Software Heritage . . . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader . OSI Board Director . . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club » -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beancount" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/20161113080459.6jbet5wsqnzdaiqf%40upsilon.cc. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
