On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 06:03:58PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > > (Stefan will probably want to weigh in at this point.) > > Chiming in here: yeah, I've been thinking about it too. In abstract > terms it would probably make more sense but I'm also very sympathetic to > Martin's use case of using org-mode together with beancount-mode (which > I believe it's why he wants to keep it a minor-mode, right Martin?). > That's the only reason. If we could find a way to inject outline capability (folding sections) like in org-mode I'd be fine having it as a major-mode. The thing is, for those very large files, org-mode/outline is not just a fancy nice to have, it's a "must-have". Is there any other way of achieving the same? e.g., maybe by refactoring > the code so that you've both a major mode and a minor mode (maybe > org-mode specific) coming from the same code base? Are there other > examples of similar needs in the Emacs ecosystem? > No idea. Stefan is the expert here, I just mumble some elisp and sometimes it works. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beancount" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CAK21%2BhMoTo5hpT3grE0KqqtqeyHXdWCEiexz9Et8HOZevQ2%2BXg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
