Hello Martin, (trying a second time because Google Groups semes to have lost my previous message)
On 18/02/2019 11:22, Martin Blais wrote: > - Beancount core, parser, booking and plugins get rewritten in simple > C++ (no boost/templates, but rather on top of a bazel + absl + > protobuf + clif base with functional-style and a straightforward subset > of C++, no classes), providing its parsed and booked contents as a > stream of protobuf objects. > - All tests would remain in Python (I'm not rewriting those). > Comprehensive clean Python bindings for beancount.core would be > provided, to do as much scripting as is done today, except with types > implemented fully in C++. How do you see the possibility of using Cython instead of C++? Advantages would include the possibility of an (easier) piecewise conversion instead of a rewrite and not having to solve the problem of generating Python binding from a C++ codebase. Cheers, Dan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beancount" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beancount+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to beancount@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/f1ecbaee-899e-4a6a-26b3-b8b0fb66ae40%40grinta.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
