On Sunday, 21 April 2019 20:38:43 UTC+2, Martin Blais wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 2:26 PM Alen Šiljak <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> I believe I read somewhere that bean-web reads the file once and keeps 
>> the book (whatever the term is for the parsed data file) in memory for all 
>> the queries.
>> If so, that is quite convenient for everyday use and offsets any 
>> performance penalties of using Python with big files.
>>
>
> Yes, that was the purpose.
> However, if you do modify the file, on the next page load it will 
> automatically reparse it, which can indeed take some time.
>

That's good enough as I wouldn't necessarily mix the data entry with 
checking the reports too much.
 

>  
>
>> Speaking of which, the drawback of the Google Docs is that it is not easy 
>> to search all of them for references to bean-web, otherwise I would read 
>> more about it. 
>>
>
> It's on the cutting board for the next version. I'd switch to Fava 
> immediately and ignore it.
>

True. I may have mixed them up and am actually just reading through Fava's 
docs.
 

> This way I have to do a semantic search by reading the whole introductory 
>> document and checking the links that may be relevant according to their 
>> title. Or I'm missing something?
>> I would also like to read more about file separation and other topics but 
>> I guess I'll have to take it slow. :)
>>
>
> If you'd like to chip in to the documentation conversion, I started an 
> automated converter to markdown here:
> https://bitbucket.org/blais/beancount-jsondocs/src/default/
>

Oh, boy, that sounds good already. You must be really sick of all those 
anti-GDocs suggestions. :))
In any case, I'm a MarkDown fan so I'll put it on my to-do list right away. 
I've been ignoring the whole plain-text-accounting area for years and now 
find it amazing that there's so much functionality. Enough said.
 

> It's incomplete and buggy (see the converted files), but I think a couple 
> of evening's worth of work by someone motivated could bring this to a 
> decent level and what I'd like to do is integrate it in this work and check 
> the whole thing in Beancount as the official versioned doc in Sphinx:
> https://aumayr.github.io/beancount-docs-static/users/index.html
>
 
That looks really good and has search functionality! Thanks.

Not sure if it this is pushing too far but have you been thinking of using 
Git and some of the Git hosting sites? I mean, you surely have but I'd like 
to read your thoughts on that.
I just installed beancount on my Linux box at home and find the whole chain 
somewhat archaic even though I was hooked on Hg almost a decade ago, in 
contrast to Git. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Beancount" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/ede2a920-da23-4437-b235-62992affb141%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to