On 18/07/2020 18:11, TRS-80 wrote: >> On 2020-07-18 18:52, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: >> >> What else are you missing? > > Typical navigation stuff, like up to parent (and on and on), which I > suppose is just a matter of re-binding whatever command(s) from > outline-mode. I guess I just need to dig into those docs some more.
If you look at the key bindings for org-mode, you see that C-c C-u (the keybinding from org-mode I think you are referring to) is bound to outline-up-heading. This is one of those cases in which org-mode uses the underlying outline-mode, thus the function to call with outline-minor-mode active is the same. As for the keybinding, you can bind it C-c C-u or you can set outline-minor-mode-prefix to C-c and get all the outline commands with a nicer prefix that the default C-c @. See the documentation https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Outline-Mode.html >> What are you missing? beancount.el already has some code to augment >> outline-minor-mode to make it behave more like org-mode. If there are >> other desirable (reasonable) features I don't exclude we can add them. > > I did notice beancount-outline-cycle for instance. Nice touch. :) The idea would be to fold that into outline-mode itself, but I haven't had time to double check attribution: I stole part of the implementation from somewhere else (also with GPLv2 or later license) and GNU requires assigning copyright to FSF, thus it is a bit of a nuisance... > One thing I was missing was org-cycle-separator-lines, I did not find > any analogue in outline-mode yet (in fairness, I have not yet begun to > really study outline-mode yet, either). I don't think there is anything similar in outline(-minor)-mode. I consider it a minor visualization nicety, and I am not missing it at all, thus I am not going to work on it. > Since you asked, I thought about it and fill-paragraph was another > thing I couldn't seem to get to work, either. This is not related to > org-mode though of course. And I probably would not even have noticed > if I was just entering transactions as opposed to setting up a new set > of books and thus had some longer comments near the top of the file. I don't think this is implemented indeed. It looks useful. I'll add it to the TODO list. I'll also be happy to review a patch implementing it, of course. > I was more trying to scout out which would be the less hassle way > forward between re-mapping (an as yet unknown) number of commands from > outline-mode vs the alternative which was floated in the OP. It > sounds now like the former option not so bad after all, so that is the > way I will proceed for now. As I written above, have a look at outline-minor-mode-prefix, it may be less typing than re-binding many functions. I don't think there are beancount keybindings that would conflict. However, I don't do that myself, so you have to double check. Cheers, Dan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beancount" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/8ce24a9b-5c94-d45d-9da9-43eed7f8e1ea%40grinta.net.
