Add an American, +1. ISO format is best. Let's hope someday rationality
will prevail and we can dump the base 2 based imperial system too.

On Thu, Jun 10, 2021, 02:37 Thomas den Hollander <
[email protected]> wrote:

> There are very few countries that use MM/DD/YYYY:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_format_by_country
>
> It's good that there is a date format that is unambiguous, not only for
> the parser but also for people who don't know which format is used in the
> first place.
>
> Op donderdag 10 juni 2021 om 03:59:56 UTC+2 schreef [email protected]:
>
>> On Wednesday, June 9, 2021 at 4:51:48 PM UTC+7 [email protected]
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It's *extremely* common *in the US*, where I'm going to surmise Brandon
>>> is from. A commercial US accounting package that didn't know about checks
>>> would be laughed out of the room.
>>>
>>
>> Good thing beancount isn't a commercial US accounting package :-)
>>
>> There's no such thing as checks where I live, so I'd be a bit put out if
>> beancount made them a fundamental part of the schema just because America
>> has an archaic banking system ;-)
>>
>> > My most minor gripe, though, it is pretty jarring being in the US, is
>>>> > the requirement to use ISO8601 dates. As you can see from the GnuCash
>>>> > record, the US typically uses MM/DD/YYYY dates, and it's almost
>>>> unheard
>>>> > of to use the ISO8601 style. I believe the lexer could trivially be
>>>> > modified to accept both types as I do not believe there is any
>>>> ambiguity
>>>> > between the ISO8601 and the US method, as the four-digit year is
>>>> either
>>>> > the start or end of the string. Would adding support for the US-style
>>>> > dates be a reasonable feature request?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm shocked, *shocked*, to see a software developer asking for
>>> MM/DD/YYYY over ISO8601 :) :)
>>>
>>
>> Why should US dates get preferential treatment here? Why not Australian
>> dates?
>>
>> DD/MM/YYYY is also unambiguous with ISO8601.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Beancount" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/69b0b039-54c0-442a-a6f3-bf0580472483n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/69b0b039-54c0-442a-a6f3-bf0580472483n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Beancount" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CACGEkZsS98iX_fikL%3Dgj-eqUD%2BtBZx%2B2GqNo%3Dxo%3DtPH9rT61zg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to