On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 20:38 Red S <[email protected]> wrote: > Your example doesn't involve transferring. You're buying a brand new lot > of 9 units (short) in A, and buying a brand new lot of 9 units (long) in B. > Specify the lot to transfer. Use `balances` inside bean-query to confirm.
Fair enough. In that case what I’m looking for is a feature request to automatically make the augmentation leg lots match whatever the booking algo decides are the reduction lots. It seems Martin has discussed this possibility in the past, which made me think it was a reasonable direction. I’ve started working on this, see other thread. > > On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 5:35:44 PM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote: > >> So, I've made a bunch of progress on many of my issues, but I >> haven't yet figured out how to get cost tracking through transfers >> working. It's illustrated by example in the below email. >> >> Any suggestions on how to start attacking this are welcome. I >> am willing to jump into beancount core code if need be -- I am >> actually not even entirely sure what work, if any, is needed >> there (see my questions on this other thread >> <https://groups.google.com/g/beancount/c/vDX1oA2mJXA/m/Y8yZqUqPAQAJ>) >> >> thanks, >> eric >> >> On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 3:36 PM Eric Altendorf <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 1:38 PM Daniele Nicolodi <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to do, what beancount >>>> does, and what you expect it to be doing. Can you present a minimal >>>> ledger that shows the problem? >>>> >>> >>> Sure, here is one. Perhaps my understanding or expectations are wrong >>> (or I've made a dumb typo). >>> >>> 2000-01-01 open Equity:Opening-Balances >>> 2020-01-01 open Assets:BrokerA:USD USD >>> 2020-01-01 open Assets:BrokerA:ASSET ASSET >>> 2020-01-01 open Assets:BrokerB:ASSET ASSET >>> >>> 2020-01-01 pad Assets:BrokerA:USD Equity:Opening-Balances >>> 2020-01-02 balance Assets:BrokerA:USD 100.00 USD >>> >>> 2020-02-01 * "Buy some ASSET" >>> Assets:BrokerA:ASSET 5.00 ASSET {10.00 USD} >>> Assets:BrokerA:USD -50.00 USD >>> >>> 2020-03-01 * "Buy some more ASSET" >>> Assets:BrokerA:ASSET 4.00 ASSET {12.50 USD} >>> Assets:BrokerA:USD -50.00 USD >>> >>> 2020-05-01 * "Transfer ASSET" >>> Assets:BrokerA:ASSET -9.00 ASSET >>> Assets:BrokerB:ASSET 9.00 ASSET >>> >>> >>> Now I try these two queries on the ledger: >>> >>> beanquery> SELECT account, position, cost_date FROM >>> has_account("Assets") CLOSE ON 2020-04-01 >>> account position cost_date >>> ----------------------- ------------------------- ---------- >>> Assets:BrokerA:USD 100.00 USD >>> Equity:Opening-Balances -100.00 USD >>> Assets:BrokerA:ASSET 5.00 ASSET {10.00 USD} 2020-02-01 >>> Assets:BrokerA:USD -50.00 USD >>> Assets:BrokerA:ASSET 4.00 ASSET {12.50 USD} 2020-03-01 >>> Assets:BrokerA:USD -50.00 USD >>> >>> beanquery> SELECT account, position, cost_date FROM >>> has_account("Assets") CLOSE ON 2020-06-01 >>> account position cost_date >>> ----------------------- ------------------------- ---------- >>> Assets:BrokerA:USD 100.00 USD >>> Equity:Opening-Balances -100.00 USD >>> Assets:BrokerA:ASSET 5.00 ASSET {10.00 USD} 2020-02-01 >>> Assets:BrokerA:USD -50.00 USD >>> Assets:BrokerA:ASSET 4.00 ASSET {12.50 USD} 2020-03-01 >>> Assets:BrokerA:USD -50.00 USD >>> Assets:BrokerA:ASSET -9.00 ASSET >>> Assets:BrokerB:ASSET 9.00 ASSET >>> >>> Before the transfer, it appears the the two lots appear separately in >>> BrokerA with a cost and date. After the transfer, in the BrokerB account, >>> they've been merged with no cost or date. >>> >>> If I annotate one, the other, or both legs of the transfer transaction >>> in the ledger, with either "{USD}" or "{}" cost specs, I can induce various >>> other behaviors, but I'm just acting like a monkey with a keyboard :) , and >>> none of them are what I want, which is for BrokerB to contain both lots >>> with the original cost info. >>> >>> I think this is the same question I asked here: >>> https://groups.google.com/g/beancount/c/vDX1oA2mJXA/m/Y8yZqUqPAQAJ >>> >>> eric >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Beancount" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/7835f45f-a836-4dba-b66e-4d391826b13fn%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/7835f45f-a836-4dba-b66e-4d391826b13fn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beancount" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CAFXPr0tU_naRnhSvDAKhrqarPFUTrtMxnfazJE9VMmTw5aMd%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com.
