On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Pierre-Yves Kerembellec
<[email protected]> wrote:
> We would like to implement (or have implemented) replication beetween
> at least 2 distincts physical beanstalkd servers, so that
> a beanstalkd server does not become an architectural SPOF. Do you know
> if and when this feature would be implemented ? Ar you interesting in
> external contributions to add this capability ?
Yes! Some coworkers discussed this with me long ago, but we never got
a chance to do it. I don't know when I will have time to do it myself;
if you want to implement it I will do whatever I can to help.
We can discuss the design here on the list. Here are some
(underdeveloped) ideas from my old discussions:
* peer-peer, not master-slave
* built-in eventual consistency
- in a general-purpose store, the client has to resolve inconsistencies
- but hopefully beanstalkd can resolve inconsistencies automatically
* introduce the feature a piece at a time rather than one huge change
* maybe embed the replication protocol in the existing protocol
kr
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"beanstalk-talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
