On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Pierre-Yves Kerembellec <[email protected]> wrote: > Most of network "data" servers have some sort of master/slave > replication mechanism > to address this particular issue (MySQL, MemcacheDB, Redis, etc). I > know this is not > exactly what you had in mind (from what I've read here), but this is > an interesting > feature for us (and we are willing to implement it), so what's your > position on this ?
The design I was hoping for isn't really for scalability either, just high availability. The reason I prefer peer-peer 2-way replication is because "failover" is ridiculously simple for clients and requires no external tools or fancy routing. I'm still very much in favor even if you really want to do it master-slave. Either way this will be a great improvement. kr -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "beanstalk-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=.
