On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Rob Davies <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm a fan of the simplicity of Beanstalk - something I would like to > do is promote even wider adoption of the protocol by implementing a > Beanstalk plugin to the Apache ActiveMQ broker - so that tasks could > be optionally persistent, and there could be interchange between > ActiveMQ Queues and Beanstalk workqueues.
Just to see if I understand, you want to teach ActiveMQ to act like a beanstalk server? > I'm interested to gauge feedback to see if this would be an > abomination or if you guys think it would be useful. I'm keen not step > on anyones toes here! Don't worry about that. :) I think it would be interesting. Most likely, you'll find all sorts of problems in the protocol doc. Right now, it is mostly *descriptive* of the server, rather than *prescriptive*, so it is probably full of ambiguity. So I guess I would selfishly encourage you to proceed, because I look forward to getting lots of bug reports. :) kr -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "beanstalk-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en.
