On 5 Dec 2009, at 02:36, Keith Rarick wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Rob Davies <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I'm a fan of the simplicity of Beanstalk - something I would like to >> do is promote even wider adoption of the protocol by implementing a >> Beanstalk plugin to the Apache ActiveMQ broker - so that tasks could >> be optionally persistent, and there could be interchange between >> ActiveMQ Queues and Beanstalk workqueues. > > Just to see if I understand, you want to teach ActiveMQ to act like a > beanstalk server? Yes! > >> I'm interested to gauge feedback to see if this would be an >> abomination or if you guys think it would be useful. I'm keen not >> step >> on anyones toes here! > > Don't worry about that. :) I think it would be interesting. Most > likely, you'll find all sorts of problems in the protocol doc. Right > now, it is mostly *descriptive* of the server, rather than > *prescriptive*, so it is probably full of ambiguity. So I guess I > would selfishly encourage you to proceed, because I look forward to > getting lots of bug reports. :) > > kr > Great! - I'll get started,
cheers, Rob > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "beanstalk-talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en > . > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "beanstalk-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en.
