Exactly. Then again people might be using beanstalkd in ways I've never even imagined (ie, having constant binlog files and never catching up)
--chad On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Karen Etheridge <[email protected] > wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 09:38:02AM -0700, Carl wrote: > > That would actually be a big problem for us preventing us from > > upgrading. > > If you can't afford any downtime, you can bring up the new version, to > accept new jobs, while the old version is still processing and emptying its > tubes. That's worked well for me in the past. > > > > > On Sep 22, 1:55 am, Chad Kouse <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'd say don't spend your time writing one. I think it's fine to say > > > "empty your tubes" before upgrading. It's so easy to bring up more > > > servers that an upgrade that requires empty tubes should be simple > > > enough to not warrant any major effort on your part to read old bin > > > logs. Then again that's just my opinion I could be wrong :) > > > -- > "Remaining silent about the destruction of nature is > an endorsement of that destruction." - Edward Abbey > . . . . . > Karen Etheridge, [email protected] GCS C+++$ USL+++$ P+++$ w--- M++ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "beanstalk-talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "beanstalk-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en.
