Hei Keith,
Thanks for the detailed answer and for interpreting my babble right. Of
course I mean that I want to issue more commands on the line that is
still reserved because my select has fired on other sockets. I just
didn't make that very clear.
A new command like reserve-with-timeout, but allowing an abort? Yes that
would serve my purpose quite nicely. I have tried to think of a good
name for it, but I guess I am stuck in my libraries logic there,
'select' is all I can come up with.
How would allowing an 'abort' command sent after the old
'reserve-with-timeout' break existing clients?
kaspar
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"beanstalk-talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en.
