On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Kaspar Schiess <[email protected]> wrote: > How would allowing an 'abort' command sent after the old > 'reserve-with-timeout' break existing clients?
It wouldn't, but the implementation would be trickier, and I think it would present an interface with more potential for confusion. kr -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "beanstalk-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en.
