I don't need it to be in RAM if it's on disk, and RAM is precious on these 
nodes.  

It doesn't appear to be the correct resource utilization for my purposes.

On Friday, August 24, 2012 10:03:37 AM UTC-7, chadkouse wrote:
>
> Is there a specific reason you don't want it to put stuff in RAM?
>
> -- 
> Chad Kouse
>
> On Friday, August 24, 2012 at 1:02 PM, David Leimbach wrote:
>
> Thanks, however, I was hoping that with "-b" that beanstalk would not 
> still keep all the on-disk contents in RAM.  
>
> Even with durability on, writing 100,000 512 byte jobs to beanstalk is 
> consuming 109MB of RAM.  I was laboring under what appears to be a bad 
> assumption that beanstalk would not keep every job in RAM when I'm using 
> durable queues.
>
> Dave
>
> On Friday, August 24, 2012 9:10:41 AM UTC-7, chadkouse wrote:
>
>  Use the -b flag when starting beanstalkd.  
> Example:
> beanstalkd -b /var/spool/beanstalkd
>
> -- 
> Chad Kouse
>
> On Friday, August 24, 2012 at 12:04 PM, David Leimbach wrote:
>
> ... and is there a way to prevent it from doing so?
>
> I'm thinking about trying to use beanstalk in a situation where I'd like 
> actually queue up some "event traffic" for eventual delivery to another 
> system.  
>
> After inserting 100,000 512 byte records, I'm seeing the resident memory 
> size of beanstalkd go up to about 105MB on a 64bit platform.  
>
> I've got durable logging on so I can kill and restart the server and it 
> quickly gets back up to about 105MB fairly fast.
>
> I'm actually more interested in the durability aspect of events rather 
> than speed of retrieval and delivery.  I really want a persistent queue I 
> guess.
>
> Dave
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "beanstalk-talk" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/beanstalk-talk/-/OmR4IHGk1SkJ.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en.
>  
>
>   -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "beanstalk-talk" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/beanstalk-talk/-/hlm0E1aXPLAJ.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected] <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en.
>  
>  
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"beanstalk-talk" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/beanstalk-talk/-/VIHnIHbbK68J.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en.

Reply via email to