On Friday, August 24, 2012 7:01:32 PM UTC-7, Keith Rarick wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Bharanee Rathna > <[email protected]<javascript:>> > wrote: > > out of curiosity, do you think we can get this with mmap ? > > Nope. At least, not as easily as you seem to imply. Keeping > everything in memory is an enormously simplifying design choice. > Spilling data to disk would require beanstalkd to effectively > become a database (and probably to become slower, too). > > There are plenty of databases out there that do roughly this, > even some that pretend to be queueing systems. (And some that > pretend to be queueing systems pretending to be memcacheds.) >
I'm not going to lie, I've got some strange needs for this project :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "beanstalk-talk" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/beanstalk-talk/-/HFdfSi0I1foJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/beanstalk-talk?hl=en.
