eventually yes...just like axis has wsdl4j.jar etc...

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:59:26 +0200, Rasmus Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't it be possible to make sure, that the JWS-support is included
> in Axis AND Beehive downloads?
> 
> /Rasmus
> 
> 
> 
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> 
> > Heather,
> >
> > As sanjiva mentioned, whoever does the work, gets to make the
> > decisions...we can always move things around later if
> > required/desired. So i'd say it's settled to leave things as-is for
> > now and maybe do a VOTE later if any of the developers want to.
> >
> > thanks,
> > dims
> >
> > On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:27:39 -0700, Heather Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > wrote:
> >
> >>We all want it to be the best it can be obviously.  I think the 
> >>input/conversation is all good.  :)
> >>
> >>It all depends on how we categorize this philosophically I suppose.  There 
> >>are definitely good reasons to have this code in the WS family.  There are 
> >>also good reasons to have this code in the Beehive project.
> >>
> >>The main reason IMO to keep this implementation in Beehive is because of 
> >>the purpose of Beehive.  It is an integrated metadata-driven framework that 
> >>leverages the latest from Sun J2SE 5.0, especially the JSR-175 annotation 
> >>style.  It provides an easy-to-use programming model for building webapps.  
> >>It targets a user with fewer of the "rockstar J2EE dev" skills, a user who 
> >>is more of a business developer and doesn't want to deal with all of the 
> >>plumbing.  And Beehive will also be extensible to future subprojects that 
> >>also leverage JSR-175 style metadata.  JWS is an important brush stroke on 
> >>this canvas.
> >>
> >>We do need to flush out the details of the implementation proposal 
> >>obviously.  Once we have that in hand should we call a more formal vote or 
> >>is now the time to settle it?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 12:17 PM
> >>To: Beehive Developers
> >>Subject: Re: can i help
> >>
> >>Please don't use "JWS" .. that's already used in Axis for Java Web
> >>Services as you may know ...
> >>
> >>I didn't realize this was an RI for a JSR. If so I'm even more confused why
> >>its not a project on its own .. amongst the other various WS projects.
> >>
> >>Oh well - its finally up to the developer community, of course. If you feel
> >>comfortable with the situation then I withdraw my objection.
> >>
> >>Sanjiva.
> >>
> >>----- Original Message -----
> >>From: ". Ias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>To: <[email protected]>
> >>Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 12:57 AM
> >>Subject: Re: can i help
> >>
> >>
> >>>Here's my understanding and opinion on this issue so far as a creator of
> >>>Axis WSM.
> >>>
> >>>1. Beehive JWS, of which name is from its wiki page although I called it
> >>>Beehive WSM (I agree that JWS is better based on its history), is supposed
> >>>to implement JSR 181 as RI that BEA must provide because they lead the
> >>
> >>spec
> >>
> >>>in JCP.
> >>>
> >>>2. Beehive team has several committers (from BEA and Tmax) including the
> >>>spec lead of JSR 181 and me for the job.
> >>>
> >>>3. As I proposed roughly before, Beehive JWS consists of two layers, a JSR
> >>>181 processor and a possible integration with a web services platform such
> >>>as Axis.
> >>>
> >>>4. As far as I'm concerned, it would be good for Web Services project to
> >>>co-work on JSR 181 with BEA inside Beehive project. The reason is that JSR
> >>>181 belongs to web services technologies, but also is a practical
> >>>application of metadata newly introduced in J2SE 5.0. Beehive requires and
> >>>uses metadata a lot. We can expect help and guidance from Beehive
> >>>developers who are already very familiar with metadata.
> >>>
> >>>5. Regarding the current situation that there's no code for Beehive JWS
> >>>contributed initially by BEA, I propose that JSR 181 API part should be
> >>>checked in as soon as possible to Beehive SVN repository and we should
> >>
> >>keep
> >>
> >>>discussing how we will implement it and integrate it with Axis. I'll make
> >>>my proposal more detailed within a week, and probably talk about it in
> >>
> >>Axis
> >>
> >>>2 Summit as well. In my humble opinion, we all have a nice chance to build
> >>>an open source implementation from the early stage of its targeted spec
> >>>with spec folks and impl folks :-) In other words, the two groups can
> >>>interact productively and progressively to make a JSR 181 implementation
> >>>robust in both technical and pragmatical sense.
> >>>
> >>>Thank you all for your interest in JWS,
> >>>
> >>>Ias
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>Reply-To: "Beehive Developers" <[email protected]>
> >>>>To: "Beehive Developers"
> >>>
> >>><[email protected]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>
> >>>>Subject: Re: can i help
> >>>>Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:05:49 +0600
> >>>>
> >>>>+1 .. my personal pref is if the work is directly Web services
> >>>>related it should be done under the WS PMC as much as possible.
> >>>>
> >>>>In addition to the incubation related advantages Dims points
> >>>>out I also think others will discover this work more easily
> >>>>if its in the WS family.
> >>>>
> >>>>Sanjiva.
> >>>>
> >>>>----- Original Message -----
> >>>>From: "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>To: "Beehive Developers" <[email protected]>
> >>>>Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 8:10 AM
> >>>>Subject: Re: can i help
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Heather,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>My 2 cents, i don't really care where it is done, as long as it gets
> >>>>>done :) We can do this either under the Beehive PMC or WS PMC.
> >>>>>Objective definitely is to get this done quickly and not get stuck
> >>>>>because beehive is still in incubation. Especially since this is ALL
> >>>>>new code that needs to be written and there is NO existing code
> >>>>>contributed in the incubation phase from BEA, it would make sense to
> >>>>>do this under WS PMC (so that we can release really quickly w/o
> >>>>>waiting for beehive to get out of incubation). If you all want to do
> >>>>>that, then let me and sanjiva know...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>thanks,
> >>>>>dims
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:15:02 -0700, Heather Stephens
> >>
> >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >>>>wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>>Hi Sanjiva.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>The web service part of this project is intended to be an
> >>>
> >>>implementation
> >>>
> >>>>>>of annotation-based programming model for web services (JSR-181).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>See mail threads for latest discussion (and feel free to give your
> >>>>>>comments!) -->
> >>>>>>
> >>>http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>>>>r.apache.org&msgNo=145
> >>>>>>and
> >>>>>>
> >>>
> >>>http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>>>>r.apache.org&msgNo=155
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>JSR-181 info can be found here -->
> >>>
> >>>http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=181
> >>>
> >>>>>>Latest thinking on how it might happen within Beehive is found in
> >>>
> >>>this
> >>>
> >>>>>>proposal from Ias -->
> >>>>>>http://www.apache.org/~ias/beehive-wsm-proposal-draft.txt
> >>>>>>He and others already have prototype code in Axis that we can use
> >>>
> >>>here.
> >>>
> >>>>>>I hope this helps.
> >>>>>>H.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 8:20 PM
> >>>>>>To: Beehive Developers
> >>>>>>Subject: Re: can i help
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>If this project is a pure *Web service* project why would we do it
> >>>>>>as a part of Beehive? I'd rather see it under ws.apache.org
> >>>>>>somewhere. Maybe I misunderstood?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Sanjiva.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>----- Original Message -----
> >>>>>>From: "Mario Morgado" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>>>To: "Beehive Developers" <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 6:50 AM
> >>>>>>Subject: RE: can i help
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Once I complete reading the documentation on the various sites,  I
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>will
> >>>>>>provide feedback once i have had some time to put it into context
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Heather Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>Hey gang. Mario is interested in helping out with the WS
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>implementation
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>for Beehive.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>The first step is to review the document Ias sent out:
> >>>>>>>http://www.apache.org/~ias/beehive-wsm-proposal-draft.txt
> >>>>>>>(Ias - now that we have a wiki we can go ahead and post this URL
> >>
> >>to
> >>
> >>>>>>it.)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>And then as the plan takes shape ways you can help would include:
> >>>>>>>1. Using the implementation done by committers and posting bugs,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>asking
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>questions or sending on actual fixes to this alias.
> >>>>>>>2. Writing samples or docs.
> >>>>>>>3. Perhaps picking off a feature to implement and submitting to
> >>>
> >>>this
> >>>
> >>>>>>>alias for acceptance.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Any other ideas anyone?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>>From: Mario Morgado [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 3:40 PM
> >>>>>>>To: Heather Stephens
> >>>>>>>Subject: RE: can i help
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Hi Heather I have read the documentation, and would be happy to
> >>>
> >>>assist
> >>>
> >>>>>>>with the webservice implementation, seems very interesting having
> >>>
> >>>been
> >>>
> >>>>>>>architecting webservices for the last 2 years now, so I think I
> >>
> >>may
> >>
> >>>be
> >>>
> >>>>>>>of some use
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I have downloaded SVN, what is next.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>>From: Heather Stephens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 12:51 PM
> >>>>>>>To: Mario Morgado
> >>>>>>>Subject: RE: can i help
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Hi Mario. Sorry for the late reply.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>What part of Beehive are you interested in? The part that will be
> >>>>>>>needing the most work, other than just using Beehive to build
> >>>>>>>pageflows/controls/etc., is the webservice implementation. I've
> >>>>>>>attached the last email from ias on that subject.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I hope this helps.
> >>>>>>>Heather
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>________________________________________
> >>>>>>>From: Mario Morgado [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 7:27 AM
> >>>>>>>To: Heather Stephens
> >>>>>>>Subject: can i help
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Hi Heather I would really like to help if there is an opportunity
> >>>
> >>>for
> >>>
> >>>>>>me
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>to participate, let me know what I can do, I have downloaded the
> >>>>>>>source tree.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I am just finishing up another project FPML which started much the
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>same
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>way as beehive.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Mario Morgado
> >>>>>>>Chief Systems Architect
> >>>>>>>RDM Corporation
> >>>>>>>519-746-8483 X339
> >>>>>>>416-576-2987 Mobile
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Mario Morgado
> >>>>>>>Cheif Architect, Project Manager
> >>>>>>>RDM Corporation
> >>>>>>>519-746-8483 X339
> >>>>>>>416-576-2987 Mobile
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>--
> >>>>>Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>_________________________________________________________________
> >>>ìììì ëë ìëê ëêíê ìêë... MSN ìëì 
> >>>ììê
> >>>http://vod.msn.co.kr
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> --
> 
> Rasmus Lund
> Lund & Bendsen ApS
> Naverland 2
> DK-2600 Glostrup
> Denmark
> 
> Phone: (+45) 33 861 861
> Mobile: (+45) 2616 9999
> Private: (+45) 4656 0404
> 
> Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Web: www.lundogbendsen.dk
> 
> 


-- 
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/

Reply via email to