I notice that there is a typo in the address you have; the correct URL is below. I don't know if it is open in the firewall or not; it does resolve externally (where beahive01.bea.com wouldn't).
http://beehive01.bea.com:9090/cruisecontrol/buildresults - jeremiah -----Original Message----- From: Bryan Che [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 3:42 PM To: James Song Cc: Beehive Developers Subject: Re: expected controls detailed.tests output? OK, that's good to know. It would be helpful if there was some place to get canonical test results, including expected failures. There was an e-mail a while back pointing at http://beahive01.bea.com:9090/cruisecontrol/buildresults, but that machine isn't externally viewable. Thanks, Bryan James Song wrote: > Bryan: > > Controls detailed.tests do not pass 100%, this is by design > temporarily.Only checkin.tests pass 100% at this moment. > > -James > -----Original Message----- > From: Bryan Che [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 12:42 PM > To: Beehive Developers > Subject: expected controls detailed.tests output? > > Hi, I just tried running the detailed.tests target in > controls/test/build.xml on Linux and got the following results: > > [tch] TOTALS > [tch] ------- > [tch] TOTAL TESTS: 54 > [tch] SUCCESSES: 37 (68.52%) > [tch] FAILURES: 13 (24.07%) > [tch] ABORTS: 4 (7.41%) > [tch] SKIPS: 0 (0.0%) > [tch] VALIDATION SKIPS: 0 (0.0%) > [tch] TIMEOUTS: 0 (0.0%) > > [tch] INVALIDATIONS: 0 > [tch] SCRATCHES: 0 > [tch] ABANDONS: 0 > > Are other people getting the same failures/aborts? The controls > drt/checkin tests run with no problems (It's also a bit strange that the > > checkin/drt tests run more tests than the detailed tests). > > I'm asking because I have local changes to my build/test system and am > looking for a sanity check. From the errors, it doesn't look like I've > done anything to make the tests fail, but I want to be sure. > > I'm at SVN revision 149432. > > Thanks, > > Bryan >
