Bryan
Jeremiah Johnson wrote:
I notice that there is a typo in the address you have; the correct URL is below. I don't know if it is open in the firewall or not; it does resolve externally (where beahive01.bea.com wouldn't).
http://beehive01.bea.com:9090/cruisecontrol/buildresults
- jeremiah
-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Che [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 3:42 PM
To: James Song
Cc: Beehive Developers
Subject: Re: expected controls detailed.tests output?
OK, that's good to know. It would be helpful if there was some place to
get canonical test results, including expected failures. There was an e-mail a while back pointing at http://beahive01.bea.com:9090/cruisecontrol/buildresults, but that machine isn't externally viewable.
Thanks,
Bryan
James Song wrote:
Bryan:
Controls detailed.tests do not pass 100%, this is by design temporarily.Only checkin.tests pass 100% at this moment.
-James
-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Che [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 12:42 PM
To: Beehive Developers
Subject: expected controls detailed.tests output?
Hi, I just tried running the detailed.tests target in controls/test/build.xml on Linux and got the following results:
[tch] TOTALS [tch] ------- [tch] TOTAL TESTS: 54 [tch] SUCCESSES: 37 (68.52%) [tch] FAILURES: 13 (24.07%) [tch] ABORTS: 4 (7.41%) [tch] SKIPS: 0 (0.0%) [tch] VALIDATION SKIPS: 0 (0.0%) [tch] TIMEOUTS: 0 (0.0%)
[tch] INVALIDATIONS: 0 [tch] SCRATCHES: 0 [tch] ABANDONS: 0
Are other people getting the same failures/aborts? The controls drt/checkin tests run with no problems (It's also a bit strange that
the
checkin/drt tests run more tests than the detailed tests).
I'm asking because I have local changes to my build/test system and am
looking for a sanity check. From the errors, it doesn't look like
I've
done anything to make the tests fail, but I want to be sure.
I'm at SVN revision 149432.
Thanks,
Bryan
