> If memory serves me ...looks like no leaks to me :O) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jenda Krynicky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 9:50 AM Subject: Re: Coprocessor while running perl 5.4 (dos version)
> From: Mark G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > This looks a lot like an ix86. What generation, I don't know. Lst > > > time I > > remember explicitly knowing that my box had a >math coprocessor, I was > > running a 386. I believe the Pentium chip pulled the functionality > > back into the CPU. > > > > > that must be exactly it. the x486 was same thing. You needed an extra > > co-processor math chip. Some P machines still have room for them. It > > woudl be hard to find which exact OP is trying to use that. > > If memory serves me right there were two branches of 486. > 486DX which did have the coprocessor and 486SX which did not. > > I think the computer should give you some CPU related info when it > boots up. > > Jenda > ===== [EMAIL PROTECTED] === http://Jenda.Krynicky.cz ===== > When it comes to wine, women and song, wizards are allowed > to get drunk and croon as much as they like. > -- Terry Pratchett in Sourcery > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
