Jack Gates wrote: > On Tuesday 28 October 2008 10:06:44 am Jenda Krynicky wrote: >> >> We can't care about ALL those who read it. The best we can do is >> to care about MOST. I know it's inconvenient if you are not part >> of the majority, but there is little we can do. > > That is a cold, callous, self serving statement. One can at least > try to help those with physical challenges. How would you like it > if you found yourself in Octavian's situation and some one said > that to you?
In my opinion that is a curious and divisive post Jack. Are you suggesting that, despite bottom-posting being a de-facto standard on this list, and despite a majority of subscribers expecting it and preferring it, we should all instead top-post because there must be someone out there that likes it better that way? I'm sure Jenda has every sympathy with each individual's circumstances, but a post can only be in one style and surely that style should be what the majority favour? Perhaps I could take issue with Jenda writing 'care about' rather than 'provide for', but on the whole I agree with him while also sympathising with Octavian's point of view. The only comment that I consider to be out of order and inflammatory so far is your own. Rob -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://learn.perl.org/
