Orion, that is a good question.

I have to say though that we are heading for a world where you don't get to 
make that choice - the lowest core count SKUs will just get higher and higher.
Couple this with the current way many folks specify systems with a minimum 
amount of RAM per core (which is quite sensibly based on looking at their 
applications and how much memory they consume!) also is leading us to specify 
higher memory for two processor nodes,
and to keep a balanced DIMM configuration too. I was discussing this with some 
researchers only yesterday.

I will throw something open to the floor:
You don't HAVE to use all the cores in a CPU socket.
Yes, I realise that you have paid for them and that they are a resource which 
is available.

I am perhaps not explaining myself very well, and I imagine lots of sites 
already allocate different numbers of cores per node depending on job type.




We may be looking a getting a couple new compute nodes.  I'm leery though of 
going too high in processor core counts.  Does anyone have any general 
experiences with performance scaling up to 12 cores per processor with general 
models like CM1/WRF/RAMS on the current crop of Xeon processors?

--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office             FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                       [email protected]
Boulder, CO 80301                   http://www.nwra.com
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, [email protected] sponsored by Penguin Computing To 
change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
#####################################################################################
Scanned by MailMarshal - M86 Security's comprehensive email content security 
solution.
#####################################################################################
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of the company. Employees of XMA Ltd are 
expressly required not to make defamatory statements and not to infringe or 
authorise any infringement of copyright or any other legal right by email 
communications. Any such communication is contrary to company policy and 
outside the scope of the employment of the individual concerned. The company 
will not accept any liability in respect of such communication, and the 
employee responsible will be personally liable for any damages or other 
liability arising. XMA Limited is registered in England and Wales (registered 
no. 2051703). Registered Office: Wilford Industrial Estate, Ruddington Lane, 
Wilford, Nottingham, NG11 7EP
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, [email protected] sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

Reply via email to