On 10/02/2015 02:30 AM, John Hearns wrote:
Orion, that is a good question.
I have to say though that we are heading for a world where you don't get to
make that choice - the lowest core count SKUs will just get higher and higher.
Couple this with the current way many folks specify systems with a minimum
amount of RAM per core (which is quite sensibly based on looking at their
applications and how much memory they consume!) also is leading us to specify
higher memory for two processor nodes,
and to keep a balanced DIMM configuration too. I was discussing this with some
researchers only yesterday.
I will throw something open to the floor:
You don't HAVE to use all the cores in a CPU socket.
Yes, I realise that you have paid for them and that they are a resource which
is available.
Well, that's the rub. If we compare:
DUAL INTEL XEON 6C E5-2620V3 (2.4GHz/8GT/s/15MB) $870
DUAL INTEL XEON 12C E5-2670V3 (2.3GHz/9.6GT/s/30MB) CPU [+$2400.00]
So for the marginal cost we're close to being able to buy a whole other
node. I haven't paid for anything yet so I'm trying to feel out if it's
worth going for the higher core counts. As usual "it depends", but just
curious what people's experience has been.
I am perhaps not explaining myself very well, and I imagine lots of sites
already allocate different numbers of cores per node depending on job type.
We may be looking a getting a couple new compute nodes. I'm leery though of
going too high in processor core counts. Does anyone have any general
experiences with performance scaling up to 12 cores per processor with general
models like CM1/WRF/RAMS on the current crop of Xeon processors?
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane [email protected]
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, [email protected] sponsored by Penguin Computing To
change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
#####################################################################################
Scanned by MailMarshal - M86 Security's comprehensive email content security
solution.
#####################################################################################
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of the company. Employees of XMA Ltd are
expressly required not to make defamatory statements and not to infringe or
authorise any infringement of copyright or any other legal right by email
communications. Any such communication is contrary to company policy and
outside the scope of the employment of the individual concerned. The company
will not accept any liability in respect of such communication, and the
employee responsible will be personally liable for any damages or other
liability arising. XMA Limited is registered in England and Wales (registered
no. 2051703). Registered Office: Wilford Industrial Estate, Ruddington Lane,
Wilford, Nottingham, NG11 7EP
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane [email protected]
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, [email protected] sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
