On 02/22/2018 09:37 AM, Prentice Bisbal wrote:

In your experience, how close does actual performance of your processors match up to their theoretical performance? I'm investigating a performances issue on some of my nodes. These are older systems using AMD Opteron 6274 processors. I found literature from AMD stating the theoretical performance of these processors is 282 GFLOPS, and my LINPACK performance isn't coming close to that (I get approximately ~33% of that).  The number I often hear mentioned is actual performance should be ~85%. of theoretical performance is that a realistic number your experience?

85% makes the assumption that you have the systems configured in an optimal manner, that the compiler doesn't do anything wonky, and that, to some degree, you isolate the OS portion of the workload off of most of the cores to reduce jitter.   Among other things.

At Scalable, I'd regularly hit 60-90 % of theoretical max computing performance, with progressively more heroic tuning.   Storage, I'd typically hit 90-95% of theoretical max (good architectures almost always beat bad ones).  Networking, fairly similar, though tuning per use case mattered significantly.

I don't want this to be a discussion of what could be wrong at this point, we will get to that in future posts, I assure you!

Joe Landman
t: @hpcjoe
w: https://scalability.org

Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 

Reply via email to