BES Express supports upto 10000 users, free license. (When installed on a 
separate server other than Exchange)
It support upto 75 users when installed on Exchange.

Licenses can be obtained from BlackBerry.com website and you get one free 
support incident.
Sent on the move, from my ‎​ Javelin.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:33:12 
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Bes-Admins Digest, Vol 26, Issue 7

Send Bes-Admins mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://www.dataoutages.com/mailman/listinfo/bes-admins
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Bes-Admins digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: BES vs BES Express (Mendoza.Ronald)
   2. Re: BES vs BES Express (Vaudo, David)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:38:05 -0800
From: "Mendoza.Ronald" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Bes-admins] BES vs BES Express
To: "A list for BES Admin's to discuss issues,  etc."
        <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
        <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

No CALs required; seems like unlimited users, and only BIS data plan
required.

 

________________________________

Ron Mendoza  
Windows Server Management Section Lead

State of California



 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Vaudo, David
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 10:34 AM
To: A list for BES Admin's to discuss issues, etc.
Subject: Re: [Bes-admins] BES vs BES Express

 

How does the licensing work?  Do you still have to pay for cals?

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mendoza.Ronald
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 12:41 PM
To: A list for BES Admin's to discuss issues, etc.
Subject: Re: [Bes-admins] BES vs BES Express

 

My thought was to actually maintain BES Express for personal BlackBerrys
and BES for the state-owned but it looks like that isn't supported. The
other thought was to even migrate from BES to BES Express, but I was
pretty sure that there would be certain features unavailable to
differentiate the two products.

 

________________________________

Ron Mendoza  
Windows Server Management Section Lead

State of California

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DOWER, BRIAN
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 9:31 AM
To: A list for BES Admin's to discuss issues,etc.
Subject: Re: [Bes-admins] BES vs BES Express

 

Thanks for that, I hadn't noticed any other differences than you listed
below. Items 1 and 3 aren't an issue for us here, unfortunately we
already have a BES server so it doesn't look like we'll be able to use
BES Express. I had wanted to keep the BES Server for our exec staff, etc
and use BES Express for all the people who brought in their personal
Blackberry's. Doesn't look like that's going to happen. 

 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mendoza.Ronald
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 12:26 PM
To: A list for BES Admin's to discuss issues,etc.
Subject: [Bes-admins] BES vs BES Express

 

Speaking of BES Express, I pulled it down and took a quick read of the
documentation and as far as I can tell, these are the main differences:

 

*         Smaller number of IT Policy settings. To be honest, the
settings we use for password complexity and content protection are
there, so I didn't notice what was missing/unavailable.

*         No MDS support? As far as I can tell, there is no MDS support
which also includes accessing intranet via BlackBerry Browser. I also
didn't see a way to disable the Internet Browser, thus forcing all web
browsing through the corporate proxy/firewall (which we enforce), making
BES Express a no-go for us.

*         No Instant Messaging support? Also as far as I can tell, there
is no enterprise instant messaging integration. This is also a no-go for
us as we integrate into our LCS environment.

 

Did anyone else notice the same things or anything different?

 

________________________________

Ron Mendoza  
Windows Server Management Section Lead

State of California

 

________________________________

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email from the State of California is for
the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Any unauthorized review or use, including
disclosure or distribution, is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this
email.

________________________________

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email from the State of California is for
the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Any unauthorized review or use, including
disclosure or distribution, is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this
email.

______________________________________________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email from the State of California is for the sole 
use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential and privileged 
information. Any unauthorized review or use, including disclosure or 
distribution, is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender and destroy all copies of this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://www.dataoutages.com/pipermail/bes-admins/attachments/20100302/38269ec8/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 13:41:46 -0500
From: "Vaudo, David" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Bes-admins] BES vs BES Express
To: "A list for BES Admin's to discuss issues,  etc."
        <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
        
<6ea48479399abf41b6aae1c53de73a7d809ca39...@v-exch01.gold.ad.bentley.edu>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Is remote wipe still available?  I should probably just start reading...

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mendoza.Ronald
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 1:38 PM
To: A list for BES Admin's to discuss issues, etc.
Subject: Re: [Bes-admins] BES vs BES Express

No CALs required; seems like unlimited users, and only BIS data plan required.

________________________________
Ron Mendoza
Windows Server Management Section Lead
State of California

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Vaudo, David
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 10:34 AM
To: A list for BES Admin's to discuss issues, etc.
Subject: Re: [Bes-admins] BES vs BES Express

How does the licensing work?  Do you still have to pay for cals?

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mendoza.Ronald
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 12:41 PM
To: A list for BES Admin's to discuss issues, etc.
Subject: Re: [Bes-admins] BES vs BES Express

My thought was to actually maintain BES Express for personal BlackBerrys and 
BES for the state-owned but it looks like that isn't supported. The other 
thought was to even migrate from BES to BES Express, but I was pretty sure that 
there would be certain features unavailable to differentiate the two products.

________________________________
Ron Mendoza
Windows Server Management Section Lead
State of California

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DOWER, BRIAN
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 9:31 AM
To: A list for BES Admin's to discuss issues,etc.
Subject: Re: [Bes-admins] BES vs BES Express

Thanks for that, I hadn't noticed any other differences than you listed below. 
Items 1 and 3 aren't an issue for us here, unfortunately we already have a BES 
server so it doesn't look like we'll be able to use BES Express. I had wanted 
to keep the BES Server for our exec staff, etc and use BES Express for all the 
people who brought in their personal Blackberry's. Doesn't look like that's 
going to happen.


From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mendoza.Ronald
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 12:26 PM
To: A list for BES Admin's to discuss issues,etc.
Subject: [Bes-admins] BES vs BES Express

Speaking of BES Express, I pulled it down and took a quick read of the 
documentation and as far as I can tell, these are the main differences:


*         Smaller number of IT Policy settings. To be honest, the settings we 
use for password complexity and content protection are there, so I didn't 
notice what was missing/unavailable.

*         No MDS support? As far as I can tell, there is no MDS support which 
also includes accessing intranet via BlackBerry Browser. I also didn't see a 
way to disable the Internet Browser, thus forcing all web browsing through the 
corporate proxy/firewall (which we enforce), making BES Express a no-go for us.

*         No Instant Messaging support? Also as far as I can tell, there is no 
enterprise instant messaging integration. This is also a no-go for us as we 
integrate into our LCS environment.

Did anyone else notice the same things or anything different?

________________________________
Ron Mendoza
Windows Server Management Section Lead
State of California

________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email from the State of California is for the sole 
use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential and privileged 
information. Any unauthorized review or use, including disclosure or 
distribution, is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender and destroy all copies of this email.
________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email from the State of California is for the sole 
use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential and privileged 
information. Any unauthorized review or use, including disclosure or 
distribution, is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender and destroy all copies of this email.
________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email from the State of California is for the sole 
use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential and privileged 
information. Any unauthorized review or use, including disclosure or 
distribution, is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender and destroy all copies of this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://www.dataoutages.com/pipermail/bes-admins/attachments/20100302/e3995759/attachment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Bes-Admins mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dataoutages.com/mailman/listinfo/bes-admins
http://www.dataoutages.com
http://www.dataoutagenews.com
RSS Feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/Bes-admins
---------------------------------


End of Bes-Admins Digest, Vol 26, Issue 7
*****************************************
_______________________________________________
Bes-Admins mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dataoutages.com/mailman/listinfo/bes-admins
http://www.dataoutages.com
http://www.dataoutagenews.com
RSS Feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/Bes-admins
---------------------------------

Reply via email to