Hi Martin, Yes, indeed, https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2085/
Cheers, Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Martin Vigoureux <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 8:10 AM To: Alissa Cooper <[email protected]>, Loa Andersson <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, IESG <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [bess] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-01: (with COMMENT) >Just for information, the authors (3 out of 4) have answered that they >were not aware of any *undisclosed* IPR, which somehow implies that some >had already been disclosed. > >-m > >Le 29/09/2015 14:59, Alissa Cooper a écrit : >> Hi Loa, >> >>> >>> The operational mode of most working groups are to make the existence >>>of >>> an IPR disclosure know to the working group in working group adoption >>>polls, working group last calls and in other postings . WG members can >>> then check the disclosure. >> >> Yep, I was wondering if the above happened. Martin confirmed that it >>did not. >> >> Alissa >> >>> >>> >>> On 2015-09-29 18:15, Martin Vigoureux wrote: >>>> Hello Alissa, >>>> >>>> thank you. >>>> Regarding your comment, I searched a bit in the archives. >>>> The IPR disclosure (05/2013) announcement has apparently only been >>>>sent >>>> to ipr-announce. I hasn't been sent to the L2VPN list. >>>> The Chairs of the L2VPN WG did poll the list for any undisclosed IPR >>>>at >>>> the time of the WG LC (10/2014). >>>> But in short I could not find any specific discussion on the >>>>disclosure >>>> within L2VPN (and there has not been any in BESS which inherited of >>>>the >>>> doc post WGLC). >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Martin >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 28/09/2015 18:15, Alissa Cooper a écrit : >>>>> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for >>>>> draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn-01: No Objection >>>>> >>>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >>>>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut >>>>>this >>>>> introductory paragraph, however.) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Please refer to >>>>>https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >>>>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-spbm-evpn/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> COMMENT: >>>>> >>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> Was there WG discussion of https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2085/ and >>>>> whether to proceed? The shepherd write-up doesn't say. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> BESS mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >> >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >BESS mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
