Hi, Alia, On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Alia Atlas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Typed too fast - looping wouldn't happen if the TTL is decremented. What > would > happen is that the packet would be dropped. I think the text change shows > that > but happy to poke more :-) > Right, I'm talking about the problem where looping happens. Spencer > > Alia > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, Alia, >> >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Alia Atlas <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Spencer, >>> >>> I think that the "may not work properly" means that the packet would be >>> dropped >>> by the local PE. The looping issue would happen if the TTL weren't >>> decremented >>> and that language is being removed. >>> >> >> So, that's two different issues? It might be be great to call them out >> separately, if so ... >> >> Spencer >> >> >>> Regards, >>> Alia >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Spencer Dawkins < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for >>>> draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-06: No Objection >>>> >>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >>>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >>>> introductory paragraph, however.) >>>> >>>> >>>> Please refer to >>>> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >>>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >>>> >>>> >>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> COMMENT: >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> I support Alia's Discuss. I see that there's proposed text to resolve >>>> that position. >>>> >>>> I will remain a No-Objection if that proposed text is adopted, but I >>>> would be more comfortable if the proposed text was more specific than >>>> "may not work properly" - is there anything else that can go wrong, >>>> besides unbounded looping? >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> BESS mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >>>> >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
