I believe if we go for the solutions we should include this scenario.
From: Ali Sajassi <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday 8 April 2016 at 09:21 To: Wim Henderickx <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [bess] draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gateway-02 Hi Wim, The current draft is for vlan-based mode of EVPN-VPWS; where each EVPN P2P LSP tunnel is mapped to a single service. If needed, it can be expanded to vlan-bundle EVPN-VPWS mode as well. Cheers, Ali From: BESS <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of "Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 3:58 PM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [bess] draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gateway-02 Resending with proper email address of Sami From: Wim Henderickx <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday 7 April 2016 at 15:51 To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gateway-02 The draft tries to address a 1:1 auto-provisioning between the VPWS and Service on the service PE. Would the draft also address a 1:N provisioning model, meaning 1 VPWS to multiple services using VLAN multiplexing on the service PE?
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
