Ok thx From: EXT Sami Boutros <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: Sami Boutros <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday 8 April 2016 at 09:40 To: Wim Henderickx <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Sami Boutros <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gateway-02
Hi Wim, As Ali mentioned, the different service interfaces supported under evpn-vpws can be supported, for the vlan-aware services under the same evpn-vpws LSP, ideas as the one described by the new draft that Ali will publish can be used. Will add a section on this too, in that case a separate evpn AD route per vlan service will be advertised, and multiple evpn-ad routes will share the same evpn-vpws LSP label. Thanks, Sami On Thursday, April 7, 2016 11:58 AM, "Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Resending with proper email address of Sami From: Wim Henderickx <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday 7 April 2016 at 15:51 To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gateway-02 The draft tries to address a 1:1 auto-provisioning between the VPWS and Service on the service PE. Would the draft also address a 1:N provisioning model, meaning 1 VPWS to multiple services using VLAN multiplexing on the service PE?
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
