Hi Thomas,

I updated and checked-in a new rev of this draft couple of weeks ago to address 
the comments that came up on this email thread - the main changes were outlined 
in my previous email. Can you please progress this draft for its LC. If there 
is any issue preventing the progress of this draft, would you let us know.

Regards,
Ali

From: Cisco Employee <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 at 12:04 AM
To: John E Drake <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Thomas Morin 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, IDR 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, BESS 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
 "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay vs. draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps
Resent-From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Cisco 
Employee <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Resent-To: Cisco Employee <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 at 12:05 AM


Folks,

I have updated and published rev03 of even-overlay draft.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay/

The main changes are:

  1.  section 10.2 - DCI using ASBR
  2.  The setting of Ethernet tag and VNI fields - there were some 
inconsistencies in different sections. Section 5.1.3 captures the setting of 
these fields for different type of services in pretty good details. All other 
sections were cleaned up and now refer to section 5.1.3.

Thomas,
The draft is ready for its long-overdue WG LC considering how long its has been 
around and its multi-vendor implementation status.

Regards,
Ali
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to